Purpose of reviewDifferent markers are available to diagnose and monitor celiac disease (CeD); however, the concordance among them and their efficacy are still controversial. We aim at defining the efficacy of CeD biomarkers, their advantages and limits.Recent findingsCeD diagnostic criteria are widely accepted, being a positive serology and duodenal atrophy (according to the Marsh-Oberhuber score) the main hallmarks. Flow cytometry and other molecular biomarkers support the diagnosis of refractory CeD. On the other side, CeD monitoring is less defined, as the biomarkers are not always reliable. To date, the reference standard to detect mucosal healing is represented by duodenal histology, but its timing and significance are debated. Novel scores may better define the trend of mucosal damage and MicroRNAs are among the innovative noninvasive biomarkers. The assessment of a correct gluten-free diet (GFD) is another aspect of CeD monitoring, based upon questionnaires and recently developed tools such as dosage of urinary or faecal gluten immunogenic peptides.SummaryClinicians lack of a widely acknowledged tools to monitor CeD and GFD. Here, we present the efficacy of the most used markers.

Biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease: Can you count on me? / M. Topa, D.S. Sanders, L. Elli. - In: CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 0267-1379. - 38:3(2022), pp. 263-269. [10.1097/MOG.0000000000000825]

Biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease: Can you count on me?

M. Topa
Primo
;
L. Elli
Ultimo
2022

Abstract

Purpose of reviewDifferent markers are available to diagnose and monitor celiac disease (CeD); however, the concordance among them and their efficacy are still controversial. We aim at defining the efficacy of CeD biomarkers, their advantages and limits.Recent findingsCeD diagnostic criteria are widely accepted, being a positive serology and duodenal atrophy (according to the Marsh-Oberhuber score) the main hallmarks. Flow cytometry and other molecular biomarkers support the diagnosis of refractory CeD. On the other side, CeD monitoring is less defined, as the biomarkers are not always reliable. To date, the reference standard to detect mucosal healing is represented by duodenal histology, but its timing and significance are debated. Novel scores may better define the trend of mucosal damage and MicroRNAs are among the innovative noninvasive biomarkers. The assessment of a correct gluten-free diet (GFD) is another aspect of CeD monitoring, based upon questionnaires and recently developed tools such as dosage of urinary or faecal gluten immunogenic peptides.SummaryClinicians lack of a widely acknowledged tools to monitor CeD and GFD. Here, we present the efficacy of the most used markers.
celiac disease; gluten-free diet monitoring; innovative molecular biomarkers; new endoscopic techniques
Settore MEDS-10/A - Gastroenterologia
2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
biomarkers_for_the_diagnosis_and_monitoring_of.12.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 872.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
872.55 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1143276
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact