In multidimensional geriatric assessment, elderly patients are evaluated from different points of view to decide whether to accept or reject their requests for special benefits. The decision is taken in several stages and it does not currently rely on any decision support system. The need to make it more equitable and consistent gave rise to this case study, based on data relating to a retrospective cohort of patients over 67 years of age, who underwent a geriatric examination and geriatric multi-dimensional assessment. To avoid selection and evaluation bias, it was deemed appropriate to consider only patients evaluated with the same methodology and measurement scales. In a preliminary step some inconsistencies were identified in the available data-set. Then, a subset of patients in need for a re-evaluation was defined by a suitable combi- nation of different methods: namely, threshold values related to single indicators, dominance analysis and search for inconsistent pairs. This subset of patients was re-evaluated and a tentative classification model was developed. Therefore, the outcome of the case study was a critical review of the data, the model and the decision-making process.

On the Evaluation of the Degree of Disability of the Elderly: A Case Study / C.F. Bonetta, L.A. Grossi, G. Righini (LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE). - In: Decision Sciences / [a cura di] A.A. Juan, J. Faulin, D. Lopez-Lopez. - [s.l] : Springer, 2025. - ISBN 9783031782374. - pp. 151-162 (( Intervento presentato al 2. convegno Decision Science Alliance International Summer Conference 2024 tenutosi a Valencia nel 2024 [10.1007/978-3-031-78238-1_14].

On the Evaluation of the Degree of Disability of the Elderly: A Case Study

G. Righini
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

In multidimensional geriatric assessment, elderly patients are evaluated from different points of view to decide whether to accept or reject their requests for special benefits. The decision is taken in several stages and it does not currently rely on any decision support system. The need to make it more equitable and consistent gave rise to this case study, based on data relating to a retrospective cohort of patients over 67 years of age, who underwent a geriatric examination and geriatric multi-dimensional assessment. To avoid selection and evaluation bias, it was deemed appropriate to consider only patients evaluated with the same methodology and measurement scales. In a preliminary step some inconsistencies were identified in the available data-set. Then, a subset of patients in need for a re-evaluation was defined by a suitable combi- nation of different methods: namely, threshold values related to single indicators, dominance analysis and search for inconsistent pairs. This subset of patients was re-evaluated and a tentative classification model was developed. Therefore, the outcome of the case study was a critical review of the data, the model and the decision-making process.
Decision science; Classification; Integer linear programming
Settore MATH-06/A - Ricerca operativa
2025
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025 - Bonetta Grossi Righini.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 229.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
229.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1141275
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact