Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.An algorithm for neuropathic cancer pain diagnosis was validated in patients with cancer pain, and using quantitative sensory testing, their sensory profiling has been described.Introduction:Better diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic cancer pain (NcP) remains an unmet clinical need. The EAPC/IASP algorithm was specifically designed for NcP diagnosis; yet, to date, there is no information on its application and accuracy.Objectives:Our aim was to determine the accuracy of the EAPC/IASP algorithm compared with the Neuropathic Special Interest Group grading system (gold standard) and to describe patients' sensory profile with quantitative sensory testing (QST).Methods:This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in a palliative care and pain outpatient clinic. Patients with cancer pain intensity >= 3 (numerical rating scale 0-10) were eligible. The palliative care physician applied the EAPC/IASP algorithm as a grading system to diagnose probable or definite NcP, and an independent investigator applied the gold standard and performed the QST. Sensitivity and specificity of the EAPC/IASP algorithm were measured in comparison with the gold standard results. Kruskal-Wallis and unequal variance independent-samples t tests were used to compare the QST parameters in patients with and without NcP.Results:Ninety-eight patients were enrolled from August 2020 to March 2023. Sensitivity and specificity for the EAPC/IASP algorithm were 85% (95% CI 70.2-94.3) and 98.3% (95% CI 90.8-100), respectively. Patients with NcP in contrast to patients without NcP showed cold hypoesthesia (P = 0.0032), warm hypoesthesia (P = 0.0018), pressure hyperalgesia (P = 0.02), and the presence of allodynia (P = 0.0001).Conclusion:The results indicate a good performance of the EAPC/IASP algorithm in diagnosing NcP and the QST discriminated well between patients with and without NcP.
Application and accuracy of the EAPC/IASP diagnostic algorithm for neuropathic cancer pain and quantitative sensory testing profile in patients with pain due to cancer / M. Shkodra, M. Mulvey, M. Fallon, C. Brunelli, E. Zecca, P. Bracchi, M. Caputo, G. Massa, S. Lo Dico, R. Rolke, S. Kaasa, A. Caraceni. - In: PAIN REPORTS. - ISSN 2471-2531. - 9:2(2024 Apr), pp. e1140.1-e1140.10. [10.1097/pr9.0000000000001140]
Application and accuracy of the EAPC/IASP diagnostic algorithm for neuropathic cancer pain and quantitative sensory testing profile in patients with pain due to cancer
M. Caputo;G. Massa;A. CaraceniUltimo
2024
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.An algorithm for neuropathic cancer pain diagnosis was validated in patients with cancer pain, and using quantitative sensory testing, their sensory profiling has been described.Introduction:Better diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic cancer pain (NcP) remains an unmet clinical need. The EAPC/IASP algorithm was specifically designed for NcP diagnosis; yet, to date, there is no information on its application and accuracy.Objectives:Our aim was to determine the accuracy of the EAPC/IASP algorithm compared with the Neuropathic Special Interest Group grading system (gold standard) and to describe patients' sensory profile with quantitative sensory testing (QST).Methods:This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in a palliative care and pain outpatient clinic. Patients with cancer pain intensity >= 3 (numerical rating scale 0-10) were eligible. The palliative care physician applied the EAPC/IASP algorithm as a grading system to diagnose probable or definite NcP, and an independent investigator applied the gold standard and performed the QST. Sensitivity and specificity of the EAPC/IASP algorithm were measured in comparison with the gold standard results. Kruskal-Wallis and unequal variance independent-samples t tests were used to compare the QST parameters in patients with and without NcP.Results:Ninety-eight patients were enrolled from August 2020 to March 2023. Sensitivity and specificity for the EAPC/IASP algorithm were 85% (95% CI 70.2-94.3) and 98.3% (95% CI 90.8-100), respectively. Patients with NcP in contrast to patients without NcP showed cold hypoesthesia (P = 0.0032), warm hypoesthesia (P = 0.0018), pressure hyperalgesia (P = 0.02), and the presence of allodynia (P = 0.0001).Conclusion:The results indicate a good performance of the EAPC/IASP algorithm in diagnosing NcP and the QST discriminated well between patients with and without NcP.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
application_and_accuracy_of_the_eapc_iasp.10.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
617.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
617.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.