Reducing starch digestibility in bread while maintaining its quality has been a trending topic in recent decades. This study explores the effects of different fermentation methods—Direct Method (DM), Poolish (PO), and Sourdough (SD)—combined with semolina of varying granulometry (Fine Semolina (FS), ~150 μm; Coarse Semolina (CS), ~550 μm) on bread properties. A full factorial design was employed to assess the influence of these variables on dough properties (pH and total titratable acidity (TTA)), bread quality (porosity, texture profile analysis, and volume), and in vitro digestibility (using Englyst’s method). Results indicate that SD-fermented doughs exhibited higher TTA and lower pH, leading to bread with reduced porosity and volume compared to PO and DM, and a reduced starch digestibility due to a dense crumb structure. CS produced slightly more porous bread with lower resistant starch than FS. To conclude, the fermentation method was the major factor influencing bread quality and digestibility.
Can fermentation methods and granulometry modulate bread starch digestibility without hindering its technological quality? / M. Tagliasco, F. Boukid, S. Renzetti, A. Marti, E. Bancalari, E. Vittadini, N. Pellegrini. - In: JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS. - ISSN 1756-4646. - 122:(2024 Nov), pp. 106464.1-106464.8. [10.1016/j.jff.2024.106464]
Can fermentation methods and granulometry modulate bread starch digestibility without hindering its technological quality?
A. Marti;
2024
Abstract
Reducing starch digestibility in bread while maintaining its quality has been a trending topic in recent decades. This study explores the effects of different fermentation methods—Direct Method (DM), Poolish (PO), and Sourdough (SD)—combined with semolina of varying granulometry (Fine Semolina (FS), ~150 μm; Coarse Semolina (CS), ~550 μm) on bread properties. A full factorial design was employed to assess the influence of these variables on dough properties (pH and total titratable acidity (TTA)), bread quality (porosity, texture profile analysis, and volume), and in vitro digestibility (using Englyst’s method). Results indicate that SD-fermented doughs exhibited higher TTA and lower pH, leading to bread with reduced porosity and volume compared to PO and DM, and a reduced starch digestibility due to a dense crumb structure. CS produced slightly more porous bread with lower resistant starch than FS. To conclude, the fermentation method was the major factor influencing bread quality and digestibility.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tagliasco et al 2024.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
659.77 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
659.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.