The aim of this work is an intra- and interlinguistic reflection on the expressions relating to the semantic field of DISABILITY1 in the main Italian and German lexicographic resources as well as in the two laws regulating and guaranteeing the right to participation of disabled people and promoting their integration in Italy and Germany, respectively (the “Legge-quadro per l’assistenza, l’integrazione sociale e i diritti delle persone handicappate” of the 5th february 1992 n. 104 and the “Gesetz zur Stärkung der Teilhabe und Selbsbestimmung von Menschen mit Behinderungen”). First, the general and specialised Italian and German monolingual lexico-graphic resources will be taken into account in order to draw preliminary conclusions concern-ing the lexicographical landscape (Section 2). After a description of the theoretical framework, the use of these expressions in the two legislative texts will be analysed by means of corpus linguistic tools. In particular, the focus will be put on the most frequent and most typical lexemes of the two compiled corpora (LQH and BTHG) and a selection of those will be examined according to their collocational structures (Section 3). As a result, a general picture of terminology related to the sematic field of DISABILITY in both languages will be given and contrastive reflections, serving as a starting point for subsequent and broader analyses, will be formulated.

Disabilità e Behinderung nelle risorse lessicografiche, nella “Legge-quadro per l’assistenza, l’integrazione sociale e i diritti delle persone handicappate” (legge 5 febbraio 1992 n. 104) e nel “Bundesteilhabegesetz” (BTHG) / C. Flinz, F. Mollica. - In: LINGUISTIK ONLINE. - ISSN 1615-3014. - 132:8(2024 Sep 21), pp. 141-166. [10.13092/lo.132.11448]

Disabilità e Behinderung nelle risorse lessicografiche, nella “Legge-quadro per l’assistenza, l’integrazione sociale e i diritti delle persone handicappate” (legge 5 febbraio 1992 n. 104) e nel “Bundesteilhabegesetz” (BTHG)

C. Flinz
Co-primo
;
F. Mollica
Co-primo
2024

Abstract

The aim of this work is an intra- and interlinguistic reflection on the expressions relating to the semantic field of DISABILITY1 in the main Italian and German lexicographic resources as well as in the two laws regulating and guaranteeing the right to participation of disabled people and promoting their integration in Italy and Germany, respectively (the “Legge-quadro per l’assistenza, l’integrazione sociale e i diritti delle persone handicappate” of the 5th february 1992 n. 104 and the “Gesetz zur Stärkung der Teilhabe und Selbsbestimmung von Menschen mit Behinderungen”). First, the general and specialised Italian and German monolingual lexico-graphic resources will be taken into account in order to draw preliminary conclusions concern-ing the lexicographical landscape (Section 2). After a description of the theoretical framework, the use of these expressions in the two legislative texts will be analysed by means of corpus linguistic tools. In particular, the focus will be put on the most frequent and most typical lexemes of the two compiled corpora (LQH and BTHG) and a selection of those will be examined according to their collocational structures (Section 3). As a result, a general picture of terminology related to the sematic field of DISABILITY in both languages will be given and contrastive reflections, serving as a starting point for subsequent and broader analyses, will be formulated.
Disabilità; Legge-quadro; Bundesteilhabegesetz;
Settore GERM-01/C - Lingua, traduzione e linguistica tedesca
21-set-2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
IA_07_Flinz_Mollica_Endversion2_13+Aug_12h03.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 799.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
799.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1101348
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact