Objectives: To evaluate pattern of use and clinical outcomes in pediatric/adolescent patients enrolled in the IDEAL study. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of IDEAL retrospective-prospective observational study focused on patients <18 years, 100% on prophylaxis during the entire observation period. Results: Thirteen subjects (median age 10.0 years; 61.5% ≤ 11 years) were analyzed. The infusion frequency changed from 2/week in 84.6% (N = 11) of patients with previous rFIX, to less than 1/weekly in 76.9% (N = 9) with rIX-FP and the annualized number of infusions reduced of 57% (p = .002), from a mean ± SD of 95.1 ± 22.77 to 40.4 ± 6.79, respectively. Annualized mean consumption decreased of about 56% (p = .001), from 3748.4 ± 1155.40 IU/kg with previous rFIX, to 1656.8 ± 456.63 IU/kg of rIX-FP. Mean FIX trough level changed from 3.0% ± 1.98% to 10.92% ± 3.6%. Low mean Annualized Bleeding Rate was maintained across all prophylaxis regimens (0.8 ± 1.69 vs. 0.3 ± 0.89) and zero bleeding patients moved from 69.2% (N = 9) with previous rFIX to 84.6% (N = 11) with rIX-FP (p = .63). Two adverse events, none related to rIX-FP, occurred in two patients. No inhibitors development was reported. Conclusions: The results in this pediatric/adolescent subgroup support rIX-FP prophylaxis may reduce infusion frequency, while providing high FIX trough levels, stable annualized bleeding rate and a good safety profile.

Pattern of use and clinical outcomes with rIX‐FP in pediatric/adolescent patients with haemophilia B in Italy: Results from IDEAL real‐world study / P. Giordano, B. Pollio, G. Sottilotta, C. Biasoli, F. Daniele, R. De Cristofaro, F. Peyvandi, M.R. Villa, G. Castaman. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0902-4441. - 112:5(2024 May), pp. 765-775. [10.1111/ejh.14168]

Pattern of use and clinical outcomes with rIX‐FP in pediatric/adolescent patients with haemophilia B in Italy: Results from IDEAL real‐world study

F. Peyvandi;
2024

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate pattern of use and clinical outcomes in pediatric/adolescent patients enrolled in the IDEAL study. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of IDEAL retrospective-prospective observational study focused on patients <18 years, 100% on prophylaxis during the entire observation period. Results: Thirteen subjects (median age 10.0 years; 61.5% ≤ 11 years) were analyzed. The infusion frequency changed from 2/week in 84.6% (N = 11) of patients with previous rFIX, to less than 1/weekly in 76.9% (N = 9) with rIX-FP and the annualized number of infusions reduced of 57% (p = .002), from a mean ± SD of 95.1 ± 22.77 to 40.4 ± 6.79, respectively. Annualized mean consumption decreased of about 56% (p = .001), from 3748.4 ± 1155.40 IU/kg with previous rFIX, to 1656.8 ± 456.63 IU/kg of rIX-FP. Mean FIX trough level changed from 3.0% ± 1.98% to 10.92% ± 3.6%. Low mean Annualized Bleeding Rate was maintained across all prophylaxis regimens (0.8 ± 1.69 vs. 0.3 ± 0.89) and zero bleeding patients moved from 69.2% (N = 9) with previous rFIX to 84.6% (N = 11) with rIX-FP (p = .63). Two adverse events, none related to rIX-FP, occurred in two patients. No inhibitors development was reported. Conclusions: The results in this pediatric/adolescent subgroup support rIX-FP prophylaxis may reduce infusion frequency, while providing high FIX trough levels, stable annualized bleeding rate and a good safety profile.
bleeding; haemophilia B; nonacog‐alfa; observational; pediatric; prophylaxis; rIX‐FP; real‐world;
Settore MED/09 - Medicina Interna
mag-2024
15-gen-2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Giordano EUR J HEM.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.36 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1076963
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact