Introduction: There is no standard procedure to evaluated the peak of reflex cough flow (PCF-reflex) in the literature, which is important assessment in subjects with acquired brain injury and tracheostomy cannula. The present study aims to investigate the PCF of the reflex cough in a broad sample of healthy controls and, furthermore, the presence and the strength of voluntary and reflex cough in subjects with ABI with tracheostomy cannula.Materials and methods: We recruited 147 participants including the healthy subjects (n = 105) and acquired brain injury subjects (n = 43), who underwent respiratory assessment: the Tidal Volume, Forced Vital Capacity, PCF of voluntary cough (PCF-voluntary) and PCF-reflex (using a spirometer connected with a nebulizer by a bidirectional).Results: The PCF-reflex of controls and subjects was significant lower than the PCF-voluntary (P < 0.01). The PCF-voluntary was not assessed in 26 (60.5 %) subjects due to severe cognitive deficit. In subjects without cognitive deficits (n = 17; 39.5 %), it was significantly lower than in healthy controls (p < 0.01). In contrast, the PCF-reflex was completed in all subjects and it was not significantly different from healthy controls. Furthermore, the strength of the PCF-reflex decreased with increasing inhalation numbers of nebulised air.Conclusion: Reflex cough behaviour differs largely from voluntary cough and the PCF results reflect this great discrepancy. PCF-reflex could be useful parameter for assessing the airway protection whereas PCF-voluntary for measuring airway clearance.

The assessment of the peak of reflex cough in subjects with acquired brain injury and tracheostomy and healthy controls / C. Enrichi, C. Zanetti, C. Gregorio, I. Koch, A. Vio, K. Palmer, F. Meneghello, F. Piccione, I. Battel. - In: RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY. - ISSN 1878-1519. - 274:(2020), pp. 103356.1-103356.7. [10.1016/j.resp.2019.103356]

The assessment of the peak of reflex cough in subjects with acquired brain injury and tracheostomy and healthy controls

C. Gregorio;I. Battel
2020

Abstract

Introduction: There is no standard procedure to evaluated the peak of reflex cough flow (PCF-reflex) in the literature, which is important assessment in subjects with acquired brain injury and tracheostomy cannula. The present study aims to investigate the PCF of the reflex cough in a broad sample of healthy controls and, furthermore, the presence and the strength of voluntary and reflex cough in subjects with ABI with tracheostomy cannula.Materials and methods: We recruited 147 participants including the healthy subjects (n = 105) and acquired brain injury subjects (n = 43), who underwent respiratory assessment: the Tidal Volume, Forced Vital Capacity, PCF of voluntary cough (PCF-voluntary) and PCF-reflex (using a spirometer connected with a nebulizer by a bidirectional).Results: The PCF-reflex of controls and subjects was significant lower than the PCF-voluntary (P < 0.01). The PCF-voluntary was not assessed in 26 (60.5 %) subjects due to severe cognitive deficit. In subjects without cognitive deficits (n = 17; 39.5 %), it was significantly lower than in healthy controls (p < 0.01). In contrast, the PCF-reflex was completed in all subjects and it was not significantly different from healthy controls. Furthermore, the strength of the PCF-reflex decreased with increasing inhalation numbers of nebulised air.Conclusion: Reflex cough behaviour differs largely from voluntary cough and the PCF results reflect this great discrepancy. PCF-reflex could be useful parameter for assessing the airway protection whereas PCF-voluntary for measuring airway clearance.
Settore MED/34 - Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa
2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1569904819301247-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 825.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
825.98 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1068909
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact