Introduction: In advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the issue of whether Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) should be stopped or not after clinical complete response (cCR) achievement remains an unmet clinical need.Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study across 7 Italian dermato-oncology units including patients with BCC who continued vismodegib after cCR between 2012 and 2019. We assessed the relationship between the duration of vismodegib intake (days to cCR [DTCR], days to stop after cCR [DTS], total treatment days [TTD]), and disease-free survival (DFS). Reasons to stop vismodegib were (R1) toxicity and (R2) disease recurrence. The relationship between DTCR, DTS, TTD, and DFS in the whole population and in R1 subgroup was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient (P < .05) and Bayesian statistics (BF10).Results: Sixty-eight BCC patients with a median (m) age of 75.5 years (39-100) were included. Most patients were male (N = 43, 63%), without Gorlin syndrome (N = 56, 82%) and with head and neck area as primary site (N = 51, 75%). After cCR, out of 68 patients, 90% (N = 61/68) discontinued vismodegib: 82% (N = 50/61) due to toxicity (R1), and 18% (N = 11/61) due to recurrence (R2). Conversely, 10% (N = 7/68) continued vismodegib until last follow-up. In the whole population (N = 68), cCR was achieved with a mDTCR of 180.50 days. DFS showed a significant correlation with DTS (P < .01, BF10 = 39.2) and TTD (P < .01, BF10 = 35566), while it was not correlated to DTCR (BF10 < 0.1). The analysis of R1 subgroup (N = 50) confirmed these results. DFS correlated with DTS in all recurrent patients (N = 38, r = 0.44, P < .01) and in the recurrent patients who stopped vismodegib for toxicity (N = 26, r = 0.665, P < .01). DFS was longer when vismodegib was maintained for >2 months after cCR (mDFS > 2 months, N = 54 vs. <= 2 months, N = 14: 470 vs. 175 d, P < .01).Conclusions: Our retrospective results suggest that HHIs should be continued after cCR to improve DFS in BCC.

Hedgehog inhibitors beyond clinical complete response in basal cell carcinoma: should I stop or should I go? / S. Alfieri, R. Romanò, S. Marceglia, V. De Giorgi, K. Peris, P. Sollena, A. Piccerillo, R. Moro, G. Gualdi, P. Ascierto, M. Palla, M. Paone, L. Eibenschutz, F. Spagnolo, P. Queirolo, D. Filippini, S. Cavalieri, C. Resteghini, C. Bergamini, A. Manocchio, L. Licitra, P. Bossi. - In: THE ONCOLOGIST. - ISSN 1083-7159. - 29:5(2024 May), pp. e699-e707. [10.1093/oncolo/oyad319]

Hedgehog inhibitors beyond clinical complete response in basal cell carcinoma: should I stop or should I go?

S. Marceglia;S. Cavalieri;A. Manocchio;L. Licitra
Penultimo
;
2024

Abstract

Introduction: In advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the issue of whether Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) should be stopped or not after clinical complete response (cCR) achievement remains an unmet clinical need.Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study across 7 Italian dermato-oncology units including patients with BCC who continued vismodegib after cCR between 2012 and 2019. We assessed the relationship between the duration of vismodegib intake (days to cCR [DTCR], days to stop after cCR [DTS], total treatment days [TTD]), and disease-free survival (DFS). Reasons to stop vismodegib were (R1) toxicity and (R2) disease recurrence. The relationship between DTCR, DTS, TTD, and DFS in the whole population and in R1 subgroup was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient (P < .05) and Bayesian statistics (BF10).Results: Sixty-eight BCC patients with a median (m) age of 75.5 years (39-100) were included. Most patients were male (N = 43, 63%), without Gorlin syndrome (N = 56, 82%) and with head and neck area as primary site (N = 51, 75%). After cCR, out of 68 patients, 90% (N = 61/68) discontinued vismodegib: 82% (N = 50/61) due to toxicity (R1), and 18% (N = 11/61) due to recurrence (R2). Conversely, 10% (N = 7/68) continued vismodegib until last follow-up. In the whole population (N = 68), cCR was achieved with a mDTCR of 180.50 days. DFS showed a significant correlation with DTS (P < .01, BF10 = 39.2) and TTD (P < .01, BF10 = 35566), while it was not correlated to DTCR (BF10 < 0.1). The analysis of R1 subgroup (N = 50) confirmed these results. DFS correlated with DTS in all recurrent patients (N = 38, r = 0.44, P < .01) and in the recurrent patients who stopped vismodegib for toxicity (N = 26, r = 0.665, P < .01). DFS was longer when vismodegib was maintained for >2 months after cCR (mDFS > 2 months, N = 54 vs. <= 2 months, N = 14: 470 vs. 175 d, P < .01).Conclusions: Our retrospective results suggest that HHIs should be continued after cCR to improve DFS in BCC.
basal cell carcinoma; beyond complete response; hedgehog inhibitors; maintenance therapy; sonidegib; vismodegib
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
Settore MEDS-09/A - Oncologia medica
mag-2024
21-dic-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
oyad319.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 6.9 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.9 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
074.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 577.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
577.37 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1039362
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact