Encoding methods are employed across several process mining tasks, including predictive process monitoring, anomalous case detection, trace clustering, etc. These methods are usually performed as preprocessing steps and are responsible for mapping complex event data information into a numerical feature space. Most papers choose existing encoding methods arbitrarily or employ a strategy based on expert domain knowledge. Moreover, existing methods are employed by using their default parameters without evaluating other options. This practice can lead to several drawbacks, such as suboptimal performance and unfair comparisons with the state-of-the-art. Therefore, this work aims at providing a comprehensive survey and benchmark on event log encoding by comparing 27 methods, from different natures, in terms of expressivity, scalability, correlation, and domain agnosticism. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study so far focusing on trace encoding in process mining. It contributes to maturing awareness about the role of trace encoding in process mining pipelines and sheds light on issues, concerns, and future research directions regarding the use of encoding methods to bridge the gap between machine learning models and process mining.
Trace encoding in process mining: A survey and benchmarking / G.M. Tavares, R.S. Oyamada, S. Barbon, P. Ceravolo. - In: ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. - ISSN 0952-1976. - 126:(2023 Nov), pp. 107028.1-107028.23. [10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107028]
Trace encoding in process mining: A survey and benchmarking
R.S. Oyamada
;P. Ceravolo
2023
Abstract
Encoding methods are employed across several process mining tasks, including predictive process monitoring, anomalous case detection, trace clustering, etc. These methods are usually performed as preprocessing steps and are responsible for mapping complex event data information into a numerical feature space. Most papers choose existing encoding methods arbitrarily or employ a strategy based on expert domain knowledge. Moreover, existing methods are employed by using their default parameters without evaluating other options. This practice can lead to several drawbacks, such as suboptimal performance and unfair comparisons with the state-of-the-art. Therefore, this work aims at providing a comprehensive survey and benchmark on event log encoding by comparing 27 methods, from different natures, in terms of expressivity, scalability, correlation, and domain agnosticism. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study so far focusing on trace encoding in process mining. It contributes to maturing awareness about the role of trace encoding in process mining pipelines and sheds light on issues, concerns, and future research directions regarding the use of encoding methods to bridge the gap between machine learning models and process mining.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0952197623012125-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
2.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.