PurposeRandom start protocols are commonly used for oocyte cryopreservation in women with cancer. However, albeit generally reassuring, available evidence is still insufficient to rule out a sub-optimal cycle outcome. This study aimed to compare follicular steroidogenesis between women initiating the random start protocol in the luteal phase and those initiating in the follicular phase.MethodsConsecutive women with cancer scheduled for oocyte cryostorage were prospectively recruited. We excluded those requiring a concomitant letrozole assumption. All women received a standardized protocol with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. At the time of oocyte retrieval, follicular fluids were pooled, and a sample was collected and frozen at -80 & DEG;C. All samples were assayed concomitantly after thawing by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The concentration of 15 different steroid hormones was determined.ResultsSeventy-one women were recruited. Thirty-three initiated the ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase, while the remaining 38 initiated in the follicular phase. Baseline characteristics were generally similar. Cycle outcome did also not differ; the median (interquartile range) number of frozen mature oocytes was 9 (5-14) and 10 (5-21), respectively (p = 0.42). None of the 15 tested steroid hormones differed.ConclusionsThe endocrine microenvironment surrounding oocytes is not markedly influenced by the phase of the menstrual cycle at the initiation of ovarian stimulation. This result further supports the validity of random start protocols.

Follicular steroidogenesis in random start protocols for oocyte cryopreservation / G. Galati, E. Somigliana, M. Ciaffaglione, M. Reschini, N. Serra, E. Sanzani, P. Viganò, E. Polledri, S. Fustinoni, L. Muzii, F. Filippi. - In: JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS. - ISSN 1573-7330. - 40:9(2023 Sep), pp. 2149-2156. [10.1007/s10815-023-02883-z]

Follicular steroidogenesis in random start protocols for oocyte cryopreservation

E. Somigliana
Secondo
;
M. Reschini;N. Serra;E. Polledri;S. Fustinoni;
2023

Abstract

PurposeRandom start protocols are commonly used for oocyte cryopreservation in women with cancer. However, albeit generally reassuring, available evidence is still insufficient to rule out a sub-optimal cycle outcome. This study aimed to compare follicular steroidogenesis between women initiating the random start protocol in the luteal phase and those initiating in the follicular phase.MethodsConsecutive women with cancer scheduled for oocyte cryostorage were prospectively recruited. We excluded those requiring a concomitant letrozole assumption. All women received a standardized protocol with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. At the time of oocyte retrieval, follicular fluids were pooled, and a sample was collected and frozen at -80 & DEG;C. All samples were assayed concomitantly after thawing by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The concentration of 15 different steroid hormones was determined.ResultsSeventy-one women were recruited. Thirty-three initiated the ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase, while the remaining 38 initiated in the follicular phase. Baseline characteristics were generally similar. Cycle outcome did also not differ; the median (interquartile range) number of frozen mature oocytes was 9 (5-14) and 10 (5-21), respectively (p = 0.42). None of the 15 tested steroid hormones differed.ConclusionsThe endocrine microenvironment surrounding oocytes is not markedly influenced by the phase of the menstrual cycle at the initiation of ovarian stimulation. This result further supports the validity of random start protocols.
No
English
Fertility preservation; Oocyte; Random start; Steroids;
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
set-2023
13-lug-2023
Springer
40
9
2149
2156
8
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
pubmed
scopus
crossref
wos
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Follicular steroidogenesis in random start protocols for oocyte cryopreservation / G. Galati, E. Somigliana, M. Ciaffaglione, M. Reschini, N. Serra, E. Sanzani, P. Viganò, E. Polledri, S. Fustinoni, L. Muzii, F. Filippi. - In: JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS. - ISSN 1573-7330. - 40:9(2023 Sep), pp. 2149-2156. [10.1007/s10815-023-02883-z]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
11
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
G. Galati, E. Somigliana, M. Ciaffaglione, M. Reschini, N. Serra, E. Sanzani, P. Viganò, E. Polledri, S. Fustinoni, L. Muzii, F. Filippi...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Galati_J Assisted Reproduction and genetics.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 638.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
638.68 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/993728
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact