We study repeated bilateral trade where an adaptive $\sigma$-smooth adversary generates the valuations of sellers and buyers. We provide a complete characterization of the regret regimes for fixed-price mechanisms under different feedback models in the two cases where the learner can post either the same or different prices to buyers and sellers.We begin by showing that the minimax regret after $T$ rounds is of order $\sqrt{T}$ in the full-feedback scenario. Under partial feedback, any algorithm that has to post the same price to buyers and sellers suffers worst-case linear regret. However, when the learner can post two different prices at each round, we design an algorithm enjoying regret of order $T^{3/4}$ ignoring log factors.We prove that this rate is optimal by presenting a surprising $T^{3/4}$ lower bound, which is the main technical contribution of the paper.

Repeated Bilateral Trade Against a Smoothed Adversary / N. Cesa Bianchi, T. Cesari, R. Colomboni, F. Fusco, S. Leonardi (PROCEEDINGS OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH). - In: The Thirty Sixth Annual Conference on Learning Theory / [a cura di] G. Neu, L. Rosasco. - [s.l] : PMLR, 2023. - pp. 1095-1130 (( Intervento presentato al 6. convegno Annual Conference on Learning Theory tenutosi a Bangalore nel 2023.

Repeated Bilateral Trade Against a Smoothed Adversary

N. Cesa Bianchi;T. Cesari;R. Colomboni;
2023

Abstract

We study repeated bilateral trade where an adaptive $\sigma$-smooth adversary generates the valuations of sellers and buyers. We provide a complete characterization of the regret regimes for fixed-price mechanisms under different feedback models in the two cases where the learner can post either the same or different prices to buyers and sellers.We begin by showing that the minimax regret after $T$ rounds is of order $\sqrt{T}$ in the full-feedback scenario. Under partial feedback, any algorithm that has to post the same price to buyers and sellers suffers worst-case linear regret. However, when the learner can post two different prices at each round, we design an algorithm enjoying regret of order $T^{3/4}$ ignoring log factors.We prove that this rate is optimal by presenting a surprising $T^{3/4}$ lower bound, which is the main technical contribution of the paper.
English
two-sided markets; online learning; regret minimization; smoothed analysis
Settore INF/01 - Informatica
Intervento a convegno
Comitato scientifico
Ricerca di base
Pubblicazione scientifica
   Algorithms, Games, and Digital Markets (ALGADIMAR)
   ALGADIMAR
   MINISTERO DELL'ISTRUZIONE E DEL MERITO
   2017R9FHSR_006

   European Learning and Intelligent Systems Excellence (ELISE)
   ELISE
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   H2020
   951847
The Thirty Sixth Annual Conference on Learning Theory
G. Neu, L. Rosasco
PMLR
2023
1095
1130
36
195
Volume a diffusione internazionale
Diamond
Annual Conference on Learning Theory
Bangalore
2023
6
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v195/cesa-bianchi23a/cesa-bianchi23a.pdf
DSRC - Data science research center
bibtex
Aderisco
N. Cesa Bianchi, T. Cesari, R. Colomboni, F. Fusco, S. Leonardi
Book Part (author)
open
273
Repeated Bilateral Trade Against a Smoothed Adversary / N. Cesa Bianchi, T. Cesari, R. Colomboni, F. Fusco, S. Leonardi (PROCEEDINGS OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH). - In: The Thirty Sixth Annual Conference on Learning Theory / [a cura di] G. Neu, L. Rosasco. - [s.l] : PMLR, 2023. - pp. 1095-1130 (( Intervento presentato al 6. convegno Annual Conference on Learning Theory tenutosi a Bangalore nel 2023.
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
5
Prodotti della ricerca::03 - Contributo in volume
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cesa-bianchi23a.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 470.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
470.56 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/991688
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact