This chapter aims to assess whether the systematic and pervasive legal uncertainty in which migrants are constrained in our legal systems can be regarded as a formidable tool of migration control, rather than the mere result of the states’ incapacity and lack of preparation to manage a complex phenomenon. Conceived in these terms, can the “institutional uncertainty” be considered as a symptom of “constitutional degradation”? Drawing from some of the main findings of a H2020 research project, and undertaking a comparative approach, the chapter analyses the national protection statuses provided in some European countries (and beyond). Indeed, although their complementary role to the protection system, national protection statuses often feature a reduced set of rights (compared to the ones enjoyed by beneficiaries of international protection), more precarious residence permits, broad discretionary decision-making exercised by authorities. Against this background, national protection statuses may be seen as a strategy undertaken by states to comply with international and European obligations in a less stringent fashion, while affirming a paradigm of “domination” vis-à-vis the foreigners.

Excluded from Guarantees, Excluded from the Community : “Institutional Uncertainty” in the Migration Domain as a Symptom of “Constitutional Degradation” / P. Pannia (COLLANA DI STUDI DI CONSULTA ONLINE). - In: Framing and Diagnosing Constitutional Degradation: A Comparative Perspective / [a cura di] T. Groppi, V. Carlino, G. Milani. - Genova : Consulta OnLine, 2022. - ISBN 978-88-15-29829-4. - pp. 281-289

Excluded from Guarantees, Excluded from the Community : “Institutional Uncertainty” in the Migration Domain as a Symptom of “Constitutional Degradation”

P. Pannia
2022

Abstract

This chapter aims to assess whether the systematic and pervasive legal uncertainty in which migrants are constrained in our legal systems can be regarded as a formidable tool of migration control, rather than the mere result of the states’ incapacity and lack of preparation to manage a complex phenomenon. Conceived in these terms, can the “institutional uncertainty” be considered as a symptom of “constitutional degradation”? Drawing from some of the main findings of a H2020 research project, and undertaking a comparative approach, the chapter analyses the national protection statuses provided in some European countries (and beyond). Indeed, although their complementary role to the protection system, national protection statuses often feature a reduced set of rights (compared to the ones enjoyed by beneficiaries of international protection), more precarious residence permits, broad discretionary decision-making exercised by authorities. Against this background, national protection statuses may be seen as a strategy undertaken by states to comply with international and European obligations in a less stringent fashion, while affirming a paradigm of “domination” vis-à-vis the foreigners.
Settore IUS/21 - Diritto Pubblico Comparato
2022
https://giurcost.org/contents/giurcost//COLLANA/ebook-TaniaGroppi.pdf
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pannia_constitutional degradation.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 8.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.59 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/984831
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact