We present cosmological parameter constraints estimated using the Bayesian BEYONDPLANCK analysis framework. This method supports seamless end-to-end error propagation from raw time-ordered data onto final cosmological parameters. As a first demonstration of the method, we analyzed time-ordered Planck LFI observations, combined with selected external data (WMAP 33–61 GHz, Planck HFI DR4 353 and 857 GHz, and Haslam 408 MHz) in the form of pixelized maps that are used to break critical astrophysical degeneracies. Overall, all the results are generally in good agreement with previously reported values from Planck 2018 and WMAP, with the largest relative difference for any parameter amounting about 1σ when considering only temperature multipoles between 30 ≤ ℓ ≤ 600. In cases where there are differences, we note that the BEYONDPLANCK results are generally slightly closer to the high-ℓ HFI-dominated Planck 2018 results than previous analyses, suggesting slightly less tension between low and high multipoles. Using low-ℓ polarization information from LFI and WMAP, we find a best-fit value of τ = 0.066 ± 0.013, which is higher than the low value of τ = 0.052 ± 0.008 derived from Planck 2018 and slightly lower than the value of 0.069 ± 0.011 derived from the joint analysis of official LFI and WMAP products. Most importantly, however, we find that the uncertainty derived in the BEYONDPLANCK processing is about 30 % greater than when analyzing the official products, after taking into account the different sky coverage. We argue that this uncertainty is due to a marginalization over a more complete model of instrumental and astrophysical parameters, which results in more reliable and more rigorously defined uncertainties. We find that about 2000 Monte Carlo samples are required to achieve a robust convergence for a low-resolution cosmic microwave background (CMB) covariance matrix with 225 independent modes, and producing these samples takes about eight weeks on a modest computing cluster with 256 cores.

BeyondPlanck XII. Cosmological parameter constraints with end-to-end error propagation / S. Paradiso, L.P.L. Colombo, K.J. Andersen, R. Aurlien, R. Banerji, A. Basyrov, M. Bersanelli, S. Bertocco, M. Brilenkov, M. Carbone, H.K. Eriksen, J.R. Eskilt, M.K. Foss, C. Franceschet, U. Fuskeland, S. Galeotta, M. Galloway, S. Gerakakis, E. Gjerløw, B. Hensley, D. Herman, M. Iacobellis, M. Ieronymaki, H.T. Ihle, J.B. Jewell, A. Karakci, E. Keihänen, R. Keskitalo, G. Maggio, D. Maino, M. Maris, B. Partridge, M. Reinecke, M. San, A.-. Suur-Uski, T.L. Svalheim, D. Tavagnacco, H. Thommesen, D.J. Watts, I.K. Wehus, A. Zacchei. - In: ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS. - ISSN 0004-6361. - 675:(2023 Jul), pp. A12.1-A12.12. [10.1051/0004-6361/202244060]

BeyondPlanck XII. Cosmological parameter constraints with end-to-end error propagation

S. Paradiso
Primo
;
L.P.L. Colombo
Secondo
;
M. Bersanelli;C. Franceschet;D. Maino;
2023

Abstract

We present cosmological parameter constraints estimated using the Bayesian BEYONDPLANCK analysis framework. This method supports seamless end-to-end error propagation from raw time-ordered data onto final cosmological parameters. As a first demonstration of the method, we analyzed time-ordered Planck LFI observations, combined with selected external data (WMAP 33–61 GHz, Planck HFI DR4 353 and 857 GHz, and Haslam 408 MHz) in the form of pixelized maps that are used to break critical astrophysical degeneracies. Overall, all the results are generally in good agreement with previously reported values from Planck 2018 and WMAP, with the largest relative difference for any parameter amounting about 1σ when considering only temperature multipoles between 30 ≤ ℓ ≤ 600. In cases where there are differences, we note that the BEYONDPLANCK results are generally slightly closer to the high-ℓ HFI-dominated Planck 2018 results than previous analyses, suggesting slightly less tension between low and high multipoles. Using low-ℓ polarization information from LFI and WMAP, we find a best-fit value of τ = 0.066 ± 0.013, which is higher than the low value of τ = 0.052 ± 0.008 derived from Planck 2018 and slightly lower than the value of 0.069 ± 0.011 derived from the joint analysis of official LFI and WMAP products. Most importantly, however, we find that the uncertainty derived in the BEYONDPLANCK processing is about 30 % greater than when analyzing the official products, after taking into account the different sky coverage. We argue that this uncertainty is due to a marginalization over a more complete model of instrumental and astrophysical parameters, which results in more reliable and more rigorously defined uncertainties. We find that about 2000 Monte Carlo samples are required to achieve a robust convergence for a low-resolution cosmic microwave background (CMB) covariance matrix with 225 independent modes, and producing these samples takes about eight weeks on a modest computing cluster with 256 cores.
cosmic background radiation / cosmological parameters / cosmology: observations;
Settore FIS/05 - Astronomia e Astrofisica
   Beyond Planck -- delivering state-of-the-art observations of the microwave sky from 30 to 70 GHz for the next decade
   BeyondPlanck
   European Commission
   Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
   776282

   Cosmoglobe -- mapping the universe from the Milky Way to the Big Bang
   Cosmoglobe
   European Commission
   Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
   819478

   Time-domain Gibbs sampling: From bits to inflationary gravitational waves
   Bits2Cosmology
   European Commission
   Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
   772253
lug-2023
28-giu-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
aa44060-22.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.49 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/981073
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact