Brown rot, caused by Monilinia spp., is one of the most economically important diseases of stone fruits. The fungus mainly affects the blossoms and fruit, and the resulting disease can lead to significant pre- and postharvest yield losses. Estimated yearly cost to the U.S. stakeholders for chemical protection against the disease can reach $170M. Although some degree of resistance in peach landraces (‘Bolinha’) and interspecific material (almond × peach) has been reported, genetic resistance to brown rot in peaches is still lacking. In commercial peach produc- tion, the disease is managed by practicing sanitation and the application of fungicides. The Clemson University peach breeding program within the RosBREED project aims to understand the genetics behind the peach fruit response to brown rot with the ultimate goal of combining disease resistance with high fruit quality via DNA informed breeding. To this end, 26 cultivars /advanced selections and 138 progeny, representing 9 breeding fami- lies, with ‘Bolinha’ source of resistance have been phenotyped for fruit response to brown rot using wounded and non-wounded disease assays in 2015 and 2016. Previously obtained genotypic data, and reported QTLs associat- ed with brown rot response in peach fruit, were used to obtain preliminary information on variability in brown rot associated genomic regions. Phenotypic performance or trait values of these alleles/ haplotypes were discussed. The data presented here provide a foundation for developing predictive DNA information that has potential for immediate application in U.S. peach breeding.

Breeding for Brown Rot (Monilinia spp.) Tolerance in Clemson university peach breeding program / W. Fu, R. Burrell, C. Da Silva Linge, G. Schnabel, K. Gasic. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY. - ISSN 1527-3741. - 72:2(2018), pp. 94-100.

Breeding for Brown Rot (Monilinia spp.) Tolerance in Clemson university peach breeding program

C. Da Silva Linge;
2018

Abstract

Brown rot, caused by Monilinia spp., is one of the most economically important diseases of stone fruits. The fungus mainly affects the blossoms and fruit, and the resulting disease can lead to significant pre- and postharvest yield losses. Estimated yearly cost to the U.S. stakeholders for chemical protection against the disease can reach $170M. Although some degree of resistance in peach landraces (‘Bolinha’) and interspecific material (almond × peach) has been reported, genetic resistance to brown rot in peaches is still lacking. In commercial peach produc- tion, the disease is managed by practicing sanitation and the application of fungicides. The Clemson University peach breeding program within the RosBREED project aims to understand the genetics behind the peach fruit response to brown rot with the ultimate goal of combining disease resistance with high fruit quality via DNA informed breeding. To this end, 26 cultivars /advanced selections and 138 progeny, representing 9 breeding fami- lies, with ‘Bolinha’ source of resistance have been phenotyped for fruit response to brown rot using wounded and non-wounded disease assays in 2015 and 2016. Previously obtained genotypic data, and reported QTLs associat- ed with brown rot response in peach fruit, were used to obtain preliminary information on variability in brown rot associated genomic regions. Phenotypic performance or trait values of these alleles/ haplotypes were discussed. The data presented here provide a foundation for developing predictive DNA information that has potential for immediate application in U.S. peach breeding.
Disease; Fruit; Haploblock; QTL; RosBREED
Settore AGR/07 - Genetica Agraria
2018
https://www.americanpomological.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/APS_Apr18.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/972068
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact