Gastric cancer (GC) has long been a ‘Cinderella’ among hereditary cancers. Until recently, single-gene testing (SGT) was the only approach to identify high-risk individuals. With the spread of multigene panel testing (MGPT), a debate arose on the involvement of other genes, particularly those pertaining to homologous recombination (HR) repair. We report our mono-institutional experience in genetic counseling and SGT for 54 GC patients, with the detection of nine pathogenic variants (PVs) (9/54:16.7%). Seven out of fifty (14%) patients who underwent SGT for unknown mutations were carriers of a PV in CDH1 (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 1), and MSH2 (n = 1), while one patient (2%) carried two variants of unknown significance (VUSs). CDH1 and MSH2 emerged as genes involved in early-onset diffuse and later-onset intestinal GCs, respectively. We additionally conducted MGPT on 37 patients, identifying five PVs (13.5%), including three (3/5:60%) in an HR gene (BRCA2, ATM, RAD51D) and at least one VUS in 13 patients (35.1%). Comparing PV carriers and non-carriers, we observed a statistically significant difference in PVs between patients with and without family history of GC (p-value: 0.045) or Lynch-related tumors (p-value: 0.036). Genetic counseling remains central to GC risk assessment. MGPT appeared advantageous in patients with unspecific phenotypes, although it led to challenging results.

Hereditary Gastric Cancer: Single-Gene or Multigene Panel Testing? A Mono-Institutional Experience / M. Calvello, M. Marabelli, S. Gandini, E. Marino, L. Bernard, M. Dal Molin, G. Di Cola, C. Zanzottera, G. Corso, N. Fazio, L. Gervaso, U. Fumagalli Romario, M. Barberis, A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, L. Bertario, D. Serrano, B. Bonanni. - In: GENES. - ISSN 2073-4425. - 14:5(2023), pp. 1077.1-1077.13. [10.3390/genes14051077]

Hereditary Gastric Cancer: Single-Gene or Multigene Panel Testing? A Mono-Institutional Experience

G. Corso;
2023

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) has long been a ‘Cinderella’ among hereditary cancers. Until recently, single-gene testing (SGT) was the only approach to identify high-risk individuals. With the spread of multigene panel testing (MGPT), a debate arose on the involvement of other genes, particularly those pertaining to homologous recombination (HR) repair. We report our mono-institutional experience in genetic counseling and SGT for 54 GC patients, with the detection of nine pathogenic variants (PVs) (9/54:16.7%). Seven out of fifty (14%) patients who underwent SGT for unknown mutations were carriers of a PV in CDH1 (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 1), and MSH2 (n = 1), while one patient (2%) carried two variants of unknown significance (VUSs). CDH1 and MSH2 emerged as genes involved in early-onset diffuse and later-onset intestinal GCs, respectively. We additionally conducted MGPT on 37 patients, identifying five PVs (13.5%), including three (3/5:60%) in an HR gene (BRCA2, ATM, RAD51D) and at least one VUS in 13 patients (35.1%). Comparing PV carriers and non-carriers, we observed a statistically significant difference in PVs between patients with and without family history of GC (p-value: 0.045) or Lynch-related tumors (p-value: 0.036). Genetic counseling remains central to GC risk assessment. MGPT appeared advantageous in patients with unspecific phenotypes, although it led to challenging results.
gastric cancer; multigene panel testing; BRCA1; BRCA2; CDH1; MSH2; hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome; homologous recombination DNA repair genes
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
genes-14-01077.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 642.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
642.75 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/970720
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact