Introduction: Immunoassay urine drug screen (UDS) is frequently used in clinical practice for initial screening process, being generally available, fast, and inexpensive. Exposure to widely prescribed drugs might determine false-positive UDS amphetamines, leading to diagnostic issues, wrong therapeutic choices, impairment of physician-patient relationship, and legal implications. Areas covered: To summarize and comment on a comprehensive list of compounds responsible for UDS false positives for amphetamines, we conducted a literature review on PubMed along with a comparison with Real-World Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database analysis between 2010 and 2022. Forty-four articles and 125 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) involving false-positive amphetamine UDS in psychiatric patients were retrieved from FAERS. Expert opinion: False-positive results were described in literature for antidepressants, atomoxetine, methylphenidate, and antipsychotics, but also for non-psychiatric drugs of common use, such as labetalol, fenofibrate, and metformin. Immunoassay method is usually responsible for false-positive results, and in most cases, mass spectrometry (MS) does not eventually confirm the UDS positivity. Physicians should be aware of immunoassays' limitations and when turning to a confirmatory test. Any new cross-reaction should be reported to pharmacovigilance activities.

Psychiatric and non-psychiatric drugs causing false-positive amphetamines urine test in psychiatric patients: a pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS / V. Battini, G. Cirnigliaro, L. Giacovelli, M. Boscacci, S. MASSARA MANZO, G. Mosini, G. Guarnieri, M. Gringeri, B. Benatti, E.G.I. Clementi, D. Bernardo, C. Carnovale. - In: EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 1751-2433. - 16:5(2023), pp. 453-465. [10.1080/17512433.2023.2211261]

Psychiatric and non-psychiatric drugs causing false-positive amphetamines urine test in psychiatric patients: a pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS

V. Battini
Primo
;
G. Cirnigliaro
Secondo
;
L. Giacovelli;M. Boscacci;S. MASSARA MANZO;G. Mosini;G. Guarnieri;M. Gringeri;B. Benatti;E.G.I. Clementi;D. Bernardo
Penultimo
;
C. Carnovale
Ultimo
2023

Abstract

Introduction: Immunoassay urine drug screen (UDS) is frequently used in clinical practice for initial screening process, being generally available, fast, and inexpensive. Exposure to widely prescribed drugs might determine false-positive UDS amphetamines, leading to diagnostic issues, wrong therapeutic choices, impairment of physician-patient relationship, and legal implications. Areas covered: To summarize and comment on a comprehensive list of compounds responsible for UDS false positives for amphetamines, we conducted a literature review on PubMed along with a comparison with Real-World Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database analysis between 2010 and 2022. Forty-four articles and 125 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) involving false-positive amphetamine UDS in psychiatric patients were retrieved from FAERS. Expert opinion: False-positive results were described in literature for antidepressants, atomoxetine, methylphenidate, and antipsychotics, but also for non-psychiatric drugs of common use, such as labetalol, fenofibrate, and metformin. Immunoassay method is usually responsible for false-positive results, and in most cases, mass spectrometry (MS) does not eventually confirm the UDS positivity. Physicians should be aware of immunoassays' limitations and when turning to a confirmatory test. Any new cross-reaction should be reported to pharmacovigilance activities.
Amphetamines; cross-reaction; false-positive test; immunoassay; pharmacovigilance; substance use disorder; urine; urine drug screening
Settore MED/25 - Psichiatria
Settore BIO/14 - Farmacologia
2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Psychiatric and non psychiatric drugs causing false positive amphetamines urine test in psychiatric patients a pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Review
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/970115
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact