To evaluate feasibility, reproducibility, and prognostic value of a new echocardiographic method to assess systemic arterial blood flow directed to the upper part of the body (UBAF, upper body arterial flow) alternative to superior vena cava flow (SVCF) measurement. We performed echocardiographic evaluations in 106 infants in the first 2 days of life to obtain SVCF, left ventricle output (LVO), UBAF, and standard parameters of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) significance. UBAF was calculated by subtracting from LVO the aortic arch blood flow measured immediately distally to the origin of the left subclavian artery. Main outcome measures: UBAF and SVCF agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis in terms of bias, limits of agreement and repeatability index. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was used to measure the strength of inter-rater agreement. The agreement between UBAF and SVCF was high. The Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) was 0.7434. (CCC 0.7434, 95% C.I. [0.656, 0.8111]). There was a good absolute agreement between the two raters ICC = 0.747; p value < 0.0001; 95%CI [0.601; 0.845]. Adjusting for confounding factors (BW, GA, PDA) included in the model, there was a statistically significant relationship between UBAF and SVCF. Conclusion: UBAF showed a strong agreement with the SCVF with a better reproducibility. Our data support UBAF as a potentially useful marker of cerebral perfusion in the evaluation of preterm infants.

A novel echocardiography method to assess upper body systemic blood flow in preterm infants and comparison with superior vena cava flow measurement / F. Schena, R. Iannotta, V. D'Andrea, G. Francescato, A. Mayer, G. Mancini, G. Prontera, F. Mosca, G. Vento. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS. - ISSN 0340-6199. - (2023), pp. 1-7. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1007/s00431-023-04866-9]

A novel echocardiography method to assess upper body systemic blood flow in preterm infants and comparison with superior vena cava flow measurement

F. Mosca
Penultimo
;
2023

Abstract

To evaluate feasibility, reproducibility, and prognostic value of a new echocardiographic method to assess systemic arterial blood flow directed to the upper part of the body (UBAF, upper body arterial flow) alternative to superior vena cava flow (SVCF) measurement. We performed echocardiographic evaluations in 106 infants in the first 2 days of life to obtain SVCF, left ventricle output (LVO), UBAF, and standard parameters of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) significance. UBAF was calculated by subtracting from LVO the aortic arch blood flow measured immediately distally to the origin of the left subclavian artery. Main outcome measures: UBAF and SVCF agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis in terms of bias, limits of agreement and repeatability index. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was used to measure the strength of inter-rater agreement. The agreement between UBAF and SVCF was high. The Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) was 0.7434. (CCC 0.7434, 95% C.I. [0.656, 0.8111]). There was a good absolute agreement between the two raters ICC = 0.747; p value < 0.0001; 95%CI [0.601; 0.845]. Adjusting for confounding factors (BW, GA, PDA) included in the model, there was a statistically significant relationship between UBAF and SVCF. Conclusion: UBAF showed a strong agreement with the SCVF with a better reproducibility. Our data support UBAF as a potentially useful marker of cerebral perfusion in the evaluation of preterm infants.
Neonatal hemodynamic; Preterm infants; Superior vena cava flow
Settore MED/38 - Pediatria Generale e Specialistica
2023
16-feb-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Schena Eur J Ped 2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Research
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/961136
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact