The judgment recently rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Polbud case offers the opportunity to investigate the scope of application of the right of establishment of companies under Articles 49 and 54 TFEU, in order to assess whether companies, formed in accordance with the law of a Member State and having their registered office, central administration or principal place of business within the Union, are entitled to transfer their registered office in another Member State, without losing their original status, i.e. their legal personality and applicable law, in so far as the administrative (or real) seat remains in the Member State of origin. Considering this question in light of the previous case-law of the Court of Justice, the article offers a possible interpretation of the judgment and its likely impact on Article 25 of Law 31 May 1995 No 218 (the Italian choice-of-law rule concerning companies), at the same time discussing the need for a future EU initiative on the law applicable to companies.

Il trasferimento all’estero della (sola) sede statutaria delle società di fronte alla Corte di giustizia: la sentenza Polbud / S. Bernasconi. - In: RIVISTA DI DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE PRIVATO E PROCESSUALE. - ISSN 0035-6174. - 54:3(2018 Sep), pp. 635-675.

Il trasferimento all’estero della (sola) sede statutaria delle società di fronte alla Corte di giustizia: la sentenza Polbud

S. Bernasconi
2018

Abstract

The judgment recently rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Polbud case offers the opportunity to investigate the scope of application of the right of establishment of companies under Articles 49 and 54 TFEU, in order to assess whether companies, formed in accordance with the law of a Member State and having their registered office, central administration or principal place of business within the Union, are entitled to transfer their registered office in another Member State, without losing their original status, i.e. their legal personality and applicable law, in so far as the administrative (or real) seat remains in the Member State of origin. Considering this question in light of the previous case-law of the Court of Justice, the article offers a possible interpretation of the judgment and its likely impact on Article 25 of Law 31 May 1995 No 218 (the Italian choice-of-law rule concerning companies), at the same time discussing the need for a future EU initiative on the law applicable to companies.
Settore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale
set-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/960719
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact