Aim The aim of the study is (i) to evaluate the impact of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) compared with no EOV (N-EOV); (ii) to identify the influence of EOV persistence (P-EOV) and EOV disappearance (D-EOV) during CPET on the outcomes of mortality and hospitalization in HFrEF patients; and (iii) to identify further predictors of mortality and hospitalization in patients with P-EOV. Methods and results Three hundred and fifteen stable HFrEF patients underwent CPET and were followed for 35 months. We identified 202 patients N-EOV and 113 patients with EOV. Patients with EOV presented more symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) III: 35% vs. N-EOV 20%, P < 0.05], worse cardiac function (LVEF: 28 +/- 6 vs. N-EOV 39 +/- 1, P < 0.05), higher minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (V?(E)/V?CO2 slope: 41 +/- 11 vs. N-EOV 37 +/- 8, P < 0.05) and a higher rate of deaths (26% vs. N-EOV 6%, P < 0.05) and hospitalization (29% vs. N-EOV 9%, P < 0.05). Patients with P-EOV had more severe HFrEF (NYHA IV: 23% vs. D-EOV: 9%, P < 0.05), had worse cardiac function (LVEF: 24 +/- 5 vs. D-EOV: 34 +/- 3, P < 0.05) and had lower peak oxygen consumption (V?O-2) (12.0 +/- 3.0 vs. D-EOV: 13.3 +/- 3.0 mLO(2) kg(-1).min(-1), P < 0.05). Among P-EOV, other independent predictors of mortality were V?(E)/V?CO2 slope >= 36 and V?O-2 peak <= 12 mLO(2 )kg( )(-1)min(-1); a V?(E)/V?CO2 slope >= 34 was a significant predictor of hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that HFrEF patients with P-EOV had a higher risk of mortality and higher risk of hospitalization (P < 0.05) than patients with D-EOV and N-EOV. Conclusion In HFrEF patients, EOV persistence during exercise had a strong prognostic role. In P-EOV patients, V?(E)/V?CO2 >= 36 and V?O-2 peak <= 12 mLO(2 )kg(-1) min(-1) had a further additive negative prognostic role.

Exercise oscillatory breathing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical implication / C. da Luz Goulart, P. Agostoni, E. Salvioni, L.A. Kaminsky, J. Myers, R. Arena, A. Borghi-Silva. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 2047-4881. - 29:12(2022 Sep 07), pp. 1692-1698. [10.1093/eurjpc/zwac116]

Exercise oscillatory breathing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical implication

P. Agostoni
Secondo
;
E. Salvioni;
2022

Abstract

Aim The aim of the study is (i) to evaluate the impact of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) compared with no EOV (N-EOV); (ii) to identify the influence of EOV persistence (P-EOV) and EOV disappearance (D-EOV) during CPET on the outcomes of mortality and hospitalization in HFrEF patients; and (iii) to identify further predictors of mortality and hospitalization in patients with P-EOV. Methods and results Three hundred and fifteen stable HFrEF patients underwent CPET and were followed for 35 months. We identified 202 patients N-EOV and 113 patients with EOV. Patients with EOV presented more symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) III: 35% vs. N-EOV 20%, P < 0.05], worse cardiac function (LVEF: 28 +/- 6 vs. N-EOV 39 +/- 1, P < 0.05), higher minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (V?(E)/V?CO2 slope: 41 +/- 11 vs. N-EOV 37 +/- 8, P < 0.05) and a higher rate of deaths (26% vs. N-EOV 6%, P < 0.05) and hospitalization (29% vs. N-EOV 9%, P < 0.05). Patients with P-EOV had more severe HFrEF (NYHA IV: 23% vs. D-EOV: 9%, P < 0.05), had worse cardiac function (LVEF: 24 +/- 5 vs. D-EOV: 34 +/- 3, P < 0.05) and had lower peak oxygen consumption (V?O-2) (12.0 +/- 3.0 vs. D-EOV: 13.3 +/- 3.0 mLO(2) kg(-1).min(-1), P < 0.05). Among P-EOV, other independent predictors of mortality were V?(E)/V?CO2 slope >= 36 and V?O-2 peak <= 12 mLO(2 )kg( )(-1)min(-1); a V?(E)/V?CO2 slope >= 34 was a significant predictor of hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that HFrEF patients with P-EOV had a higher risk of mortality and higher risk of hospitalization (P < 0.05) than patients with D-EOV and N-EOV. Conclusion In HFrEF patients, EOV persistence during exercise had a strong prognostic role. In P-EOV patients, V?(E)/V?CO2 >= 36 and V?O-2 peak <= 12 mLO(2 )kg(-1) min(-1) had a further additive negative prognostic role.
English
Exercise test; Heart failure; Survival; Ventilatory oscillation
Settore MED/11 - Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
7-set-2022
16-giu-2022
Oxford Academic
29
12
1692
1698
7
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
pubmed
scopus
crossref
wos
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Exercise oscillatory breathing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical implication / C. da Luz Goulart, P. Agostoni, E. Salvioni, L.A. Kaminsky, J. Myers, R. Arena, A. Borghi-Silva. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 2047-4881. - 29:12(2022 Sep 07), pp. 1692-1698. [10.1093/eurjpc/zwac116]
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
7
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
C. da Luz Goulart, P. Agostoni, E. Salvioni, L.A. Kaminsky, J. Myers, R. Arena, A. Borghi-Silva
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
zwac116.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 481.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
481.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/960385
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact