Background and purpose: This study aimed at estimating the prevalence of language impairment (LI) in a large, clinic-based cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and assessing its underpinnings at motor and non-motor levels. Methods: Non-demented ALS patients (N = 348) underwent the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS), as well as an assessment of behavioural/psychiatric and motor-functional features. The prevalence of LI was estimated based on the proportion of patients showing a performance below the age- and education-adjusted cut-off on the ECAS-Language. Multiple regression models were run to assess the determinants of language functioning and impairment. Results: The prevalence of LI was 22.7%. 46.6% of the variance of ECAS-Language scores remained unexplained, with only the ECAS-Executive positively predicting them (p < 0.001; eta(2) = 0.07). Similarly, only a lower score on the ECAS-Executive predicted a higher probability of a below cut-off ECAS-Language performance (p < 0.001). Spelling and Naming tasks were the major drivers of ECAS-Language performance. Conclusions: This study suggests that, in non-demented ALS patients, LI occurs in asymptotic to 23% of cases, is significantly driven by executive dysfunction but, at the same time, partially independent of it and is not associated with other motor or non-motor features.

Prevalence and determinants of language impairment in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients / F. Solca, E.N. Aiello, S. Torre, L. Carelli, R. Ferrucci, F. Verde, N. Ticozzi, V. Silani, A. Monti, B. Poletti. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 1351-5101. - 30:3(2023 Mar), pp. 606-611. [10.1111/ene.15652]

Prevalence and determinants of language impairment in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

R. Ferrucci;F. Verde;N. Ticozzi;V. Silani;B. Poletti
2023

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study aimed at estimating the prevalence of language impairment (LI) in a large, clinic-based cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and assessing its underpinnings at motor and non-motor levels. Methods: Non-demented ALS patients (N = 348) underwent the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS), as well as an assessment of behavioural/psychiatric and motor-functional features. The prevalence of LI was estimated based on the proportion of patients showing a performance below the age- and education-adjusted cut-off on the ECAS-Language. Multiple regression models were run to assess the determinants of language functioning and impairment. Results: The prevalence of LI was 22.7%. 46.6% of the variance of ECAS-Language scores remained unexplained, with only the ECAS-Executive positively predicting them (p < 0.001; eta(2) = 0.07). Similarly, only a lower score on the ECAS-Executive predicted a higher probability of a below cut-off ECAS-Language performance (p < 0.001). Spelling and Naming tasks were the major drivers of ECAS-Language performance. Conclusions: This study suggests that, in non-demented ALS patients, LI occurs in asymptotic to 23% of cases, is significantly driven by executive dysfunction but, at the same time, partially independent of it and is not associated with other motor or non-motor features.
Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; frontotemporal degeneration; language; primary progressive aphasia
Settore MED/26 - Neurologia
Settore M-PSI/08 - Psicologia Clinica
mar-2023
29-nov-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Solca+F+Eur+J+Neurol.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 866.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
866.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/956260
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact