The work defines three aspects of Souriau’s animal aesthetics by stressing their relevance in the context of early and contemporary ethology: in (1), the concept «biological nature» which is interpreted by Souriau as a realm of appearances and as intrinsically aesthetic; in (2), the concept of animal sensibility, which makes it possible to reframe animals’ artistic behaviours and the sense by which such phenomena estab- lish a meaningful relationship with the environment; in (3), the concept of form, in the description of natural appearances, is presented as it enters into the process of insti- tution that, accordingly to Souriau’s interpretation of biological nature, encompasses non-human animals and humans. All three definitions will allow us a), to present Sou- riau’s critique of anthropomorphism and his proposal of an «healthy» zoomorphism; b) to reformulate animals’ sensibility in a non-reductionistic fashion; and finally, c) to address the issue with the supposedly sole communicative function of animal artistic behaviors.

Souriau’s Animal Aesthetics In Context: Nature, Sensibility, and Form / M. Mazzocut-Mis, A. Scanziani. - In: AISTHESIS. - ISSN 2035-8466. - 15:2(2023), pp. 15-27. [10.36253/Aisthesis-13982]

Souriau’s Animal Aesthetics In Context: Nature, Sensibility, and Form

M. Mazzocut-Mis
Primo
;
A. Scanziani
Ultimo
2023

Abstract

The work defines three aspects of Souriau’s animal aesthetics by stressing their relevance in the context of early and contemporary ethology: in (1), the concept «biological nature» which is interpreted by Souriau as a realm of appearances and as intrinsically aesthetic; in (2), the concept of animal sensibility, which makes it possible to reframe animals’ artistic behaviours and the sense by which such phenomena estab- lish a meaningful relationship with the environment; in (3), the concept of form, in the description of natural appearances, is presented as it enters into the process of insti- tution that, accordingly to Souriau’s interpretation of biological nature, encompasses non-human animals and humans. All three definitions will allow us a), to present Sou- riau’s critique of anthropomorphism and his proposal of an «healthy» zoomorphism; b) to reformulate animals’ sensibility in a non-reductionistic fashion; and finally, c) to address the issue with the supposedly sole communicative function of animal artistic behaviors.
Souriau; Animal Aesthetics; Nature; Form; Sensibility
Settore M-FIL/04 - Estetica
2023
https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/13982
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
13982-Article Text-26877-1-10-20230206.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 295.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
295.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/954258
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact