A decisive element of moral cognition is the detection of harm and its assessment as intentional or unintentional. Moral cognition engages brain networks supporting mentalizing, intentionality, empathic concern and evaluation. These networks rely on the amygdala as a critical hub, likely through frontotemporal connections indexing stimulus salience. We assessed inferences about perceived harm using a paradigm validated through functional magnetic resonance imaging, eye-tracking and electroencephalogram recordings. During the task, we measured local field potentials in three patients with depth electrodes (n = 115) placed in the amygdala and in several frontal, temporal, and parietal locations. Direct electrophysiological recordings demonstrate that intentional harm induces early activity in the amygdala (5 200 ms), which-in turn-predicts intention attribution. The amygdala was the only site that systematically discriminated between critical conditions and predicted their classification of events as intentional. Moreover, connectivity analysis showed that intentional harm induced stronger frontotemporal information sharing at early stages. Results support the 'many roads' view of the amygdala and highlight its role in the rapid encoding of intention and salience-critical components of mentalizing and moral evaluation.

Early detection of intentional harm in the human amygdala / E. Hesse, E. Mikulan, J. Decety, M. Sigman, M. Del Carmen Garcia, W. Silva, C. Ciraolo, E. Vaucheret, F. Baglivo, D. Huepe, V. Lopez, F. Manes, T.A. Bekinschtein, A. Ibanez. - In: BRAIN. - ISSN 0006-8950. - 139:1(2016 Jan 01), pp. 54-61. [10.1093/brain/awv336]

Early detection of intentional harm in the human amygdala

E. Mikulan
Co-primo
;
2016

Abstract

A decisive element of moral cognition is the detection of harm and its assessment as intentional or unintentional. Moral cognition engages brain networks supporting mentalizing, intentionality, empathic concern and evaluation. These networks rely on the amygdala as a critical hub, likely through frontotemporal connections indexing stimulus salience. We assessed inferences about perceived harm using a paradigm validated through functional magnetic resonance imaging, eye-tracking and electroencephalogram recordings. During the task, we measured local field potentials in three patients with depth electrodes (n = 115) placed in the amygdala and in several frontal, temporal, and parietal locations. Direct electrophysiological recordings demonstrate that intentional harm induces early activity in the amygdala (5 200 ms), which-in turn-predicts intention attribution. The amygdala was the only site that systematically discriminated between critical conditions and predicted their classification of events as intentional. Moreover, connectivity analysis showed that intentional harm induced stronger frontotemporal information sharing at early stages. Results support the 'many roads' view of the amygdala and highlight its role in the rapid encoding of intention and salience-critical components of mentalizing and moral evaluation.
Amygdala; Intentional harm; Intracranial recordings; Moral cognition;
Settore BIO/09 - Fisiologia
1-gen-2016
24-nov-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
awv336.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 751.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
751.85 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/954201
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 29
  • Scopus 82
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 71
social impact