Aims: In symptomatic patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), recent international guidelines recommend initiating four major therapeutic classes rather than sequential initiation. It remains unclear how this change in guidelines is perceived by practicing cardiologists versus heart failure (HF) specialists. Methods and results: An independent academic web-based survey was designed by a group of HF specialists and posted by email and through various social networks to a broad community of cardiologists worldwide 1 year after the publication of the latest European HF guidelines. Overall, 615 cardiologists (38 [32–47] years old, 63% male) completed the survey, of which 58% were working in a university hospital and 26% were HF specialists. The threshold to define HFrEF was ≤40% for 61% of the physicians. Preferred drug prescription for the sequential approach was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors first (74%), beta-blockers second (55%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists third (52%), and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (53%) fourth. Eighty-four percent of participants felt that starting all four classes was feasible within the initial hospitalization, and 58% felt that titration is less important than introducing a new class. Age, status in training, and specialization in HF field were the principal characteristics that significantly impacted the answers. Conclusion: In a broad international cardiology community, the ‘historical approach’ to HFrEF therapies remains the preferred sequencing approach. However, accelerated introduction and uptitration are also major treatment goals. Strategy trials in treatment guidance are needed to further change practices.

Sequencing and titrating approach of therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines : an international cardiology survey / C. Fauvel, G. Bonnet, W. Mullens, C.I.S. Giraldo, A.Z. Mežnar, A. Barasa, M. Tokmakova, A. Shchendrygina, F.M. Costa, M. Mapelli, F. Zemrak, L.F. Tops, N. Jakus, A. Sultan, F. Bahouth, C. Hadjseyd, M. Salvat, M. Anselmino, D. Messroghli, V. Weberndörfer, I. Giverts, T. Bochaton, E. Berthelot, D. Legallois, F. Beauvais, F. Bauer, N. Lamblin, T. Damy, N. Girerd, L. Sebbag, T. Pezel, A. Cohen-Solal, G. Rosano, F. Roubille, N. Mewton. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 1388-9842. - (2022 Nov 20). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1002/ejhf.2743]

Sequencing and titrating approach of therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines : an international cardiology survey

M. Mapelli;
2022

Abstract

Aims: In symptomatic patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), recent international guidelines recommend initiating four major therapeutic classes rather than sequential initiation. It remains unclear how this change in guidelines is perceived by practicing cardiologists versus heart failure (HF) specialists. Methods and results: An independent academic web-based survey was designed by a group of HF specialists and posted by email and through various social networks to a broad community of cardiologists worldwide 1 year after the publication of the latest European HF guidelines. Overall, 615 cardiologists (38 [32–47] years old, 63% male) completed the survey, of which 58% were working in a university hospital and 26% were HF specialists. The threshold to define HFrEF was ≤40% for 61% of the physicians. Preferred drug prescription for the sequential approach was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors first (74%), beta-blockers second (55%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists third (52%), and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (53%) fourth. Eighty-four percent of participants felt that starting all four classes was feasible within the initial hospitalization, and 58% felt that titration is less important than introducing a new class. Age, status in training, and specialization in HF field were the principal characteristics that significantly impacted the answers. Conclusion: In a broad international cardiology community, the ‘historical approach’ to HFrEF therapies remains the preferred sequencing approach. However, accelerated introduction and uptitration are also major treatment goals. Strategy trials in treatment guidance are needed to further change practices.
guideline; heart failure; pharmacology; treatment
Settore MED/11 - Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare
20-nov-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
European J of Heart Fail - 2022 - Fauvel - Sequencing and titrating approach of therapy in heart failure with reduced.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.76 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.76 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/946605
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact