Background: Failure of conservative treatment in patients over 70 years of age with a rotator cuff tear makes surgery a possible option, considering the increase in life expectancy and the high functional demands of elderly patients. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature was to evaluate the subjective and objective outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients over 70 years of age. Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify all the studies reporting subjective and objective outcomes in patients aged 70 years or older undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Constant Murley Score (CMS), visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were used to detect any clinical improvement after surgery. Retear and satisfaction were also analyzed. Results: Out of 941 studies identified, only 6 papers have been included in the review. All studies reported improvements in postoperative functional outcome scores that exceed the minimal clinically relevant difference. The mean retear rate amounts to 21.9%, which is in line with the failure rate of rotator cuff repair in general population. Moreover, postoperative satisfaction is very high (95%). Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients over 70 years of age could be a valid treatment option after failure of conservative approach. Level of evidence: 4 Trial registration The study was registered on PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42018088613).

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients over 70 years of age: a systematic review / C. Fossati, C. Stoppani, A. Menon, L. Pierannunzii, R. Compagnoni, P.S. Randelli. - In: JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1590-9921. - 22:1(2021 Dec), pp. 3.1-3.8. [10.1186/s10195-021-00565-z]

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients over 70 years of age: a systematic review

C. Fossati
Primo
Methodology
;
C. Stoppani
Secondo
Methodology
;
A. Menon;R. Compagnoni
Penultimo
;
P.S. Randelli
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Background: Failure of conservative treatment in patients over 70 years of age with a rotator cuff tear makes surgery a possible option, considering the increase in life expectancy and the high functional demands of elderly patients. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature was to evaluate the subjective and objective outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients over 70 years of age. Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify all the studies reporting subjective and objective outcomes in patients aged 70 years or older undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Constant Murley Score (CMS), visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were used to detect any clinical improvement after surgery. Retear and satisfaction were also analyzed. Results: Out of 941 studies identified, only 6 papers have been included in the review. All studies reported improvements in postoperative functional outcome scores that exceed the minimal clinically relevant difference. The mean retear rate amounts to 21.9%, which is in line with the failure rate of rotator cuff repair in general population. Moreover, postoperative satisfaction is very high (95%). Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients over 70 years of age could be a valid treatment option after failure of conservative approach. Level of evidence: 4 Trial registration The study was registered on PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42018088613).
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Patients over 70 years of age; Rotator cuff repair in elderly; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder arthroscopy
Settore MED/33 - Malattie Apparato Locomotore
dic-2021
18-feb-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s10195-021-00565-z.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/946129
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact