Background: Scoring metrics to assess and compare outcomes of percutaneous nephro- lithotomy (PCNL) are needed. We aim to evaluate prevalence and predictors of trifecta in a cohort of patients treated with vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) for kid- ney stones. Methods: Data from 287 participants who underwent vmPCNL were analysed. Patients’ and stones’ characteristics as well as operative data were collected. Stone-free was defined as no residual stones. The modified Clavien classification was used to score postoperative complications. Trifecta was defined as stone-free status without complications after a single session and no auxil- iary procedures. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between predictors and trifecta outcome. Results: After vmPCNL, 219 (76.3%) patients were stone-free, and 81 (28.2%) had postoperative complications (any Clavien). Of 287, 170 (59.2%) patients achieved trifecta criteria. Patients who achieved trifecta status had smaller stone volume (p < 0.001), a higher rate of single stones (p < 0.001), shorter operative time (p < 0.01), and a higher rate of single percuta- neous tract (p < 0.01) than −trifecta patients. Trifecta status decreased with the number of calyces involved, being 77.1%, 18.8%, and 4.1% in patients with 1, 2, or 3 calyces with stones, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume (OR 1.1, p = 0.02) and multiple calyces being involved (OR 2.8 and OR 4.3 for two- and three-calyceal groups, respec- tively, all p < 0.01) were independent unfavourable risk factors for trifecta after accounting for age, BMI, gender, operative time, and number of access tracts. Conclusions: Trifecta status was achieved in 6 out of 10 patients after vmPCNL. Stone distribution in multiple calyceal groups and stone vol- ume were independent unfavourable risk factors for trifecta.

Validation of the Trifecta Scoring Metric in Vacuum-AssistedùMini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: ASingle-Center Experience / E. Pozzi, M. Malfatto, M. Turetti, C. Silvani, L.M.I. Jannello, S. Garbagnati, G. Galbiati, S.P. Zanetti, F. Longo, E. De Lorenzis, G. Albo, A. Salonia, E. Montanari, L. Boeri. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 11:(2022 Nov), pp. 6788.1-6788.9. [10.3390/jcm11226788]

Validation of the Trifecta Scoring Metric in Vacuum-AssistedùMini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: ASingle-Center Experience

E. Pozzi
Primo
;
M. Malfatto
Secondo
;
M. Turetti;C. Silvani;L.M.I. Jannello;S. Garbagnati;G. Galbiati;S.P. Zanetti;E. De Lorenzis;G. Albo;E. Montanari
Penultimo
;
L. Boeri
Ultimo
2022

Abstract

Background: Scoring metrics to assess and compare outcomes of percutaneous nephro- lithotomy (PCNL) are needed. We aim to evaluate prevalence and predictors of trifecta in a cohort of patients treated with vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) for kid- ney stones. Methods: Data from 287 participants who underwent vmPCNL were analysed. Patients’ and stones’ characteristics as well as operative data were collected. Stone-free was defined as no residual stones. The modified Clavien classification was used to score postoperative complications. Trifecta was defined as stone-free status without complications after a single session and no auxil- iary procedures. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between predictors and trifecta outcome. Results: After vmPCNL, 219 (76.3%) patients were stone-free, and 81 (28.2%) had postoperative complications (any Clavien). Of 287, 170 (59.2%) patients achieved trifecta criteria. Patients who achieved trifecta status had smaller stone volume (p < 0.001), a higher rate of single stones (p < 0.001), shorter operative time (p < 0.01), and a higher rate of single percuta- neous tract (p < 0.01) than −trifecta patients. Trifecta status decreased with the number of calyces involved, being 77.1%, 18.8%, and 4.1% in patients with 1, 2, or 3 calyces with stones, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume (OR 1.1, p = 0.02) and multiple calyces being involved (OR 2.8 and OR 4.3 for two- and three-calyceal groups, respec- tively, all p < 0.01) were independent unfavourable risk factors for trifecta after accounting for age, BMI, gender, operative time, and number of access tracts. Conclusions: Trifecta status was achieved in 6 out of 10 patients after vmPCNL. Stone distribution in multiple calyceal groups and stone vol- ume were independent unfavourable risk factors for trifecta.
No
English
percutaneous nephrolithotomy; vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy; stone-free rate; complications; trifecta
Settore MED/24 - Urologia
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Pubblicazione scientifica
nov-2022
MDPI
11
6788
1
9
9
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
manual
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Validation of the Trifecta Scoring Metric in Vacuum-AssistedùMini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: ASingle-Center Experience / E. Pozzi, M. Malfatto, M. Turetti, C. Silvani, L.M.I. Jannello, S. Garbagnati, G. Galbiati, S.P. Zanetti, F. Longo, E. De Lorenzis, G. Albo, A. Salonia, E. Montanari, L. Boeri. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 11:(2022 Nov), pp. 6788.1-6788.9. [10.3390/jcm11226788]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
14
262
Article (author)
si
E. Pozzi, M. Malfatto, M. Turetti, C. Silvani, L.M.I. Jannello, S. Garbagnati, G. Galbiati, S.P. Zanetti, F. Longo, E. De Lorenzis, G. Albo, A. Saloni...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jcm-11-06788.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 344.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
344.41 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/945884
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact