Background: Semi-quantitative evaluation of Modic changes (MCs) has recently been proposed as a way to standardise and increase repeatability of clinical studies. This study is aimed at developing semi-quantitative measures of enhancement, given by contrast agent injection, on T1-weighted images in MCs, and to investigate their reliability and relation with MC types. Methods: Thirty-seven subjects suffering from low back pain underwent T1-weighted and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences. Five minutes after the injection of a paramagnetic contrast agent, a second T1-weighted sequence was acquired. Regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to MCs were selected manually on the unenhanced image; control ROIs in the “healthy” bone marrow were selected. For each ROI, the mean signal intensity (SI) of unenhanced pixels and the mean absolute and normalised difference in SI between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced pixels values were calculated. Results: A total of 103 MCs were recognised and 61 were semi-quantitatively analysed: 16 type I, 34 type II and 11 type I/II. Regarding controls, MCs I showed a lower SI on the unenhanced T1-weighted images and a marked contrast enhancement (CE); MCs II showed a higher SI than controls on unenhanced images and a lower or comparable CE; and MCs I/II presented an intermediate SI on the unenhanced images and a marked CE. Inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were found to be excellent or substantial. Conclusions: Semi-quantitative measurements could differentiate MC types in terms of unenhanced SI and of CE with respect to “healthy” bone marrow.

Semi-quantitative evaluation of signal intensity and contrast-enhancement in Modic changes / M. Tibiletti, C. Ciavarro, V. Bari, I.W. Mccall, J.P.G. Urban, M. Brayda-Bruno, F. Galbusera. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL. - ISSN 2509-9280. - 1:1(2017), pp. 5.1-5.8. [10.1186/s41747-017-0009-2]

Semi-quantitative evaluation of signal intensity and contrast-enhancement in Modic changes

V. Bari;
2017

Abstract

Background: Semi-quantitative evaluation of Modic changes (MCs) has recently been proposed as a way to standardise and increase repeatability of clinical studies. This study is aimed at developing semi-quantitative measures of enhancement, given by contrast agent injection, on T1-weighted images in MCs, and to investigate their reliability and relation with MC types. Methods: Thirty-seven subjects suffering from low back pain underwent T1-weighted and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences. Five minutes after the injection of a paramagnetic contrast agent, a second T1-weighted sequence was acquired. Regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to MCs were selected manually on the unenhanced image; control ROIs in the “healthy” bone marrow were selected. For each ROI, the mean signal intensity (SI) of unenhanced pixels and the mean absolute and normalised difference in SI between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced pixels values were calculated. Results: A total of 103 MCs were recognised and 61 were semi-quantitatively analysed: 16 type I, 34 type II and 11 type I/II. Regarding controls, MCs I showed a lower SI on the unenhanced T1-weighted images and a marked contrast enhancement (CE); MCs II showed a higher SI than controls on unenhanced images and a lower or comparable CE; and MCs I/II presented an intermediate SI on the unenhanced images and a marked CE. Inter-rater and intra-rater agreements were found to be excellent or substantial. Conclusions: Semi-quantitative measurements could differentiate MC types in terms of unenhanced SI and of CE with respect to “healthy” bone marrow.
Contrast enhancement; Gadolinium-based contrast agent; Magnetic resonance imaging; Modic changes; Spine
Settore ING-INF/06 - Bioingegneria Elettronica e Informatica
2017
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/944574
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact