Bermúdez's arguments in favour of the rationality of quasi-cyclical preferences conflate reasons, desires, emotions, and responses with genuine preferences. Rational preference formation requires that the decision-makers not only identify reasons, but also weigh them in a coherent way.

Consistent preferences, conflicting reasons, and rational evaluations / F. Guala. - In: BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES. - ISSN 0140-525X. - (2022). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1017/S0140525X22000978]

Consistent preferences, conflicting reasons, and rational evaluations

F. Guala
Primo
2022

Abstract

Bermúdez's arguments in favour of the rationality of quasi-cyclical preferences conflate reasons, desires, emotions, and responses with genuine preferences. Rational preference formation requires that the decision-makers not only identify reasons, but also weigh them in a coherent way.
Settore SECS-P/01 - Economia Politica
Settore M-FIL/02 - Logica e Filosofia della Scienza
25-ott-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022_BBS_Bermudez_commentary.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 22.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
22.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/943732
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact