This article elaborates on the activities developed by various actors from the civil society in favour of non-deported refused asylum seekers (NDRAS) through the lens of ‘de-bordering solidarity’. Drawing on qualitative data collected in two small Italian cities ruled by anti-immigrant coalitions, this study explores the rationales and outcomes of migrant supporters’ actions in providing help to NDRAS, thus deepening the action of pro-immigrant civil society in small urban centres. The findings show that, while civil society’s engagement in the provision of basic needs to vulnerable people is unconditional, legal advice and practical help for access to regular status can be more selective and reflect lack of human and financial resources available, the low probability of a part of NDRAS to achieve legal status, low demand in local labour markets, and social workers’ and volunteers’ subjectivities. Despite recognizing such limits in solidarity activities, this article shows that civil society in practice challenges deportation policies through practical and daily solidarity that assumes political and cultural meanings. Based on these findings, this article suggests durable solutions for addressing the issues connected with the presence of NDRAS.

De-Bordering Solidarity: Civil Society Actors Assisting Refused Asylum Seekers in Small Cities / I. Dimitriadis, M. Ambrosini. - In: JOURNAL OF REFUGEE STUDIES. - ISSN 0951-6328. - (2022), pp. 1-19. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1093/jrs/feac048]

De-Bordering Solidarity: Civil Society Actors Assisting Refused Asylum Seekers in Small Cities

I. Dimitriadis
;
M. Ambrosini
2022

Abstract

This article elaborates on the activities developed by various actors from the civil society in favour of non-deported refused asylum seekers (NDRAS) through the lens of ‘de-bordering solidarity’. Drawing on qualitative data collected in two small Italian cities ruled by anti-immigrant coalitions, this study explores the rationales and outcomes of migrant supporters’ actions in providing help to NDRAS, thus deepening the action of pro-immigrant civil society in small urban centres. The findings show that, while civil society’s engagement in the provision of basic needs to vulnerable people is unconditional, legal advice and practical help for access to regular status can be more selective and reflect lack of human and financial resources available, the low probability of a part of NDRAS to achieve legal status, low demand in local labour markets, and social workers’ and volunteers’ subjectivities. Despite recognizing such limits in solidarity activities, this article shows that civil society in practice challenges deportation policies through practical and daily solidarity that assumes political and cultural meanings. Based on these findings, this article suggests durable solutions for addressing the issues connected with the presence of NDRAS.
civil society; refused asylum seekers; NGOs; asylum governance; Italy; small cities; de-bordering solidarity
Settore SPS/10 - Sociologia dell'Ambiente e del Territorio
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
Settore SPS/09 - Sociologia dei Processi economici e del Lavoro
H20_RIA18MAMBR_01 - MigrAtion Governance and asYlum Crises (MAGYC) - AMBROSINI, MAURIZIO - H20_RIA - Horizon 2020_Research & Innovation Action/Innovation Action - 2018
https://academic.oup.com/jrs/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jrs/feac048/6752076?login=false
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022 Dimitriadis Ambrosini JRS Debordering solidarity Refused asylum seekers.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 344.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
344.63 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/940293
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact