This retrospective study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implant placement procedures in the rehabilitation of partially edentulous and horizontally atrophic dental arches using resorbable membranes. A total of 49 patients were included, and 97 implants were placed. Patients were followed up for 3 to 7 years after loading. The data indicate that GBR with simultaneous implant placement and resorbable membranes can be a good clinical choice, and the data suggest that it could be better to horizontally reconstruct no more than 3 mm of bone in order to reduce the number of complications and to obtain stable results. However, this technique remains difficult and requires expert surgeons.

Simultaneous GBR and Implant Placement with Resorbable Membranes in the Rehabilitation of Partially Edentulous and Horizontally Atrophic Dental Arches: A Retrospective Study on 97 Implants with a 3- to 7-Year Follow-up / R. Pistilli, C. Barausse, M. Simion, L. Bonifazi, M. Karaban, A. Ferri, P. Felice. - In: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY. - ISSN 0198-7569. - 42:3(2022), pp. 371-379. [10.11607/prd.5641]

Simultaneous GBR and Implant Placement with Resorbable Membranes in the Rehabilitation of Partially Edentulous and Horizontally Atrophic Dental Arches: A Retrospective Study on 97 Implants with a 3- to 7-Year Follow-up

M. Simion;
2022

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implant placement procedures in the rehabilitation of partially edentulous and horizontally atrophic dental arches using resorbable membranes. A total of 49 patients were included, and 97 implants were placed. Patients were followed up for 3 to 7 years after loading. The data indicate that GBR with simultaneous implant placement and resorbable membranes can be a good clinical choice, and the data suggest that it could be better to horizontally reconstruct no more than 3 mm of bone in order to reduce the number of complications and to obtain stable results. However, this technique remains difficult and requires expert surgeons.
Bone Regeneration; Dental Arch; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Membranes, Artificial; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Dental Implants; Mouth, Edentulous
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
IJPRD 2022 Pistilli GBR.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 632.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
632.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/935885
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact