Scholars have started to estimate the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce the health impact of COVID-19. However, the empirical evidence is highly contested, and since it is not known exactly what would have happened without those measures, political élites are left free to give credit to the voices that they prefer the most. We argue that any sensible assessment of the effectiveness of anti-COVID policies requires methodological reflection on what is actually comparable, and how to approximate the ideal “method of difference” theorized by John Stuart Mill. By evaluating the effectiveness of school closures as an anti-COVID policy, we provide two examples in which appropriate counterfactuals are inductively discovered rather than selected a priori. In the first one, we use Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) in a cross-country setting, while in the second one, we implement the Synthetic Control Method in a within-country analysis. The article highlights the methodological advantages of including these techniques in the toolbox of policy scholars, while both examples confirm the effectiveness of school closures.
COVID-19 counterfactual evidence. Estimating the effects of school closures / M. Giuliani. - In: POLICY STUDIES. - ISSN 1470-1006. - 44:1 Thematic issue: Policy transfer during the COVID era(2023), pp. 112-131. (Intervento presentato al convegno Annual conference of the Italian Political Science Association (Società italiana di Scienza politica. SISP) tenutosi a [online] nel 2021) [10.1080/01442872.2022.2103527].
COVID-19 counterfactual evidence. Estimating the effects of school closures
M. Giuliani
2023
Abstract
Scholars have started to estimate the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce the health impact of COVID-19. However, the empirical evidence is highly contested, and since it is not known exactly what would have happened without those measures, political élites are left free to give credit to the voices that they prefer the most. We argue that any sensible assessment of the effectiveness of anti-COVID policies requires methodological reflection on what is actually comparable, and how to approximate the ideal “method of difference” theorized by John Stuart Mill. By evaluating the effectiveness of school closures as an anti-COVID policy, we provide two examples in which appropriate counterfactuals are inductively discovered rather than selected a priori. In the first one, we use Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) in a cross-country setting, while in the second one, we implement the Synthetic Control Method in a within-country analysis. The article highlights the methodological advantages of including these techniques in the toolbox of policy scholars, while both examples confirm the effectiveness of school closures.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Main Document Authour preprint.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Pre-print
Tipologia:
Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione
808.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
808.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Post-print.pdf
Open Access dal 22/12/2023
Descrizione: Post-print
Tipologia:
Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione
429.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
429.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Online Appendix.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Online Appendix
Tipologia:
Altro
Dimensione
530.97 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
530.97 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.