Understanding the role of surface modification of randomized trabecular titanium structures in bone tissue regeneration

Background and Objectives: Three-dimensional (3D) metallic trabecular structures made by additive manufacturing (AM) technologies promote new bone formation and osteointegration. Surface modifications by chemical treatments can improve the osteoconductive properties of metallic structures. An in vivo study in sheep was conducted to assess the bone response to randomized trabecular titanium structures that underwent a surface modification by chemical treatment compared to the bone response to the untreated specimens. Material and Methods: Sixteen specimens with a randomized trabecular titanium structure were implanted in the spongious bone of the distal femur and proximal tibia and the cortical bone of the tibial diaphysis of two sheep. Of them, eight implants had undergone a chemical treatment (treated) and were compared to eight implants with the same structure but native surfaces (native). The sheep were sacrificed at 6 weeks. Surface features of the lattice structures (native and treated) were analyzed using a 3D non-contact profilometer. Compression tests of 18 lattice cubes were performed to investigate the mechanical properties of the two structures. Excellent biocompatibility for the trabecular structures was demonstrated in vitro using a cell mouse fibroblast culture. Histomorphometric analysis was performed to evaluate bone implant contact and bone ingrowth. Results: A compression test of lattice cubic specimens revealed a comparable maximum compressive strength value between the two tested groups (5099 N for native surfaces; 5558 N for treated surfaces; p > 0.05). Compared to native surfaces, a homogenous formation of micropores was observed on the surface of most trabeculae that increased the surface roughness of the treated specimens (4.3 versus 3.2 mu m). The cellular viability of cells seeded on three-dimensional structure surfaces increased over time compared to that on plastic surfaces. The histomorphometric data revealed a similar behavior and response in spongious and cortical bone formation. The percentage of the implant surface in direct contact with the regenerated bone matrix (BIC) was not significantly different between the two groups either in the spongious bone (BIC: 27% for treated specimens versus 30% for native samples) or in the cortical bone (BIC: 75% for treated specimens versus 77% for native samples). Conclusions: The results of this study reveal rapid osseointegration and excellent biocompatibility for the trabecular structure regardless of surface treatment using AM technologies. The application of implant surfaces can be optimized to achieve a strong press-fit and stability, overcoming the demand for additional chemical surface treatments.