We tested the hypothesis that, if a robot apparently invests effort in teaching a new skill to a human participant, the human participant will reciprocate by investing more effort in teaching the robot a new skill, too. To this end, we devised a scenario in which the iCub and a human participant alternated in teaching each other new skills. In the Adaptive condition of the robot teaching phase, the iCub slowed down its movements when repeating a demonstration for the human learner, whereas in the Unadaptive condition it sped the movements up when repeating the demonstration. In a subsequent participant teaching phase, human participants were asked to give the iCub a demonstration, and then to repeat it if the iCub had not understood. We predicted that in the Adaptive condition, participants would reciprocate the iCub's adaptivity by investing more effort to slow down their movements and to increase segmentation when repeating their demonstration. The results showed that this was true when participants experienced the Adaptive condition after the Unadaptive condition and not when the order was inverted, indicating that participants were particularly sensitive to the changes in the iCub's level of commitment over the course of the experiment.

A Humanoid Robot s Effortful Adaptation Boosts Partners' Commitment to an Interactive Teaching Task / A. Vignolo, H. Powell, F. Rea, A. Sciutti, L. Mcellin, J. Michael. - In: ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION. - ISSN 2573-9522. - 11:1(2022), pp. 9.1-9.17. [10.1145/3481586]

A Humanoid Robot s Effortful Adaptation Boosts Partners' Commitment to an Interactive Teaching Task

J. Michael
2022

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that, if a robot apparently invests effort in teaching a new skill to a human participant, the human participant will reciprocate by investing more effort in teaching the robot a new skill, too. To this end, we devised a scenario in which the iCub and a human participant alternated in teaching each other new skills. In the Adaptive condition of the robot teaching phase, the iCub slowed down its movements when repeating a demonstration for the human learner, whereas in the Unadaptive condition it sped the movements up when repeating the demonstration. In a subsequent participant teaching phase, human participants were asked to give the iCub a demonstration, and then to repeat it if the iCub had not understood. We predicted that in the Adaptive condition, participants would reciprocate the iCub's adaptivity by investing more effort to slow down their movements and to increase segmentation when repeating their demonstration. The results showed that this was true when participants experienced the Adaptive condition after the Unadaptive condition and not when the order was inverted, indicating that participants were particularly sensitive to the changes in the iCub's level of commitment over the course of the experiment.
Commitment; human-robot interaction; kinematics; movement understanding; non-verbal communication
Settore M-PSI/01 - Psicologia Generale
2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vignolo_HRI2020_JM_.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 1.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
3481586.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 6.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/926559
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact