We tested the hypothesis that, if a robot apparently invests effort in teaching a new skill to a human participant, the human participant will reciprocate by investing more effort in teaching the robot a new skill, too. To this end, we devised a scenario in which the iCub and a human participant alternated in teaching each other new skills. In the Adaptive condition of the robot teaching phase, the iCub slowed down its movements when repeating a demonstration for the human learner, whereas in the Unadaptive condition it sped the movements up when repeating the demonstration. In a subsequent participant teaching phase, human participants were asked to give the iCub a demonstration, and then to repeat it if the iCub had not understood. We predicted that in the Adaptive condition, participants would reciprocate the iCub's adaptivity by investing more effort to slow down their movements and to increase segmentation when repeating their demonstration. The results showed that this was true when participants experienced the Adaptive condition after the Unadaptive condition and not when the order was inverted, indicating that participants were particularly sensitive to the changes in the iCub's level of commitment over the course of the experiment.
A Humanoid Robot s Effortful Adaptation Boosts Partners' Commitment to an Interactive Teaching Task / A. Vignolo, H. Powell, F. Rea, A. Sciutti, L. Mcellin, J. Michael. - In: ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION. - ISSN 2573-9522. - 11:1(2022), pp. 9.1-9.17. [10.1145/3481586]
A Humanoid Robot s Effortful Adaptation Boosts Partners' Commitment to an Interactive Teaching Task
J. Michael
2022
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that, if a robot apparently invests effort in teaching a new skill to a human participant, the human participant will reciprocate by investing more effort in teaching the robot a new skill, too. To this end, we devised a scenario in which the iCub and a human participant alternated in teaching each other new skills. In the Adaptive condition of the robot teaching phase, the iCub slowed down its movements when repeating a demonstration for the human learner, whereas in the Unadaptive condition it sped the movements up when repeating the demonstration. In a subsequent participant teaching phase, human participants were asked to give the iCub a demonstration, and then to repeat it if the iCub had not understood. We predicted that in the Adaptive condition, participants would reciprocate the iCub's adaptivity by investing more effort to slow down their movements and to increase segmentation when repeating their demonstration. The results showed that this was true when participants experienced the Adaptive condition after the Unadaptive condition and not when the order was inverted, indicating that participants were particularly sensitive to the changes in the iCub's level of commitment over the course of the experiment.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Vignolo_HRI2020_JM_.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione
1.18 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.18 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
3481586.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
6.51 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.51 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.