Drug discovery is expensive and high-risk. Its main reasons of failure are lack of efficacy and toxicity of a drug candidate. Binding affinity for the biological target has been usually considered one of the most relevant figures of merit to judge a drug candidate along with bioavailability, selectivity and metabolic properties, which could depend on off-target interactions. Nevertheless, affinity does not always satisfactorily correlate with in vivo drug efficacy. It is indeed becoming increasingly evident that the time a drug spends in contact with its target (aka residence time) can be a more reliable figure of merit. Experimental kinetic measurements are operatively limited by the cost and the time needed to synthesize compounds to be tested, to express and purify the target, and to setup the assays. We present here a simple and efficient molecular-dynamics-based computational approach to prioritize compounds according to their residence time. We devised a multiple-replica scaled molecular dynamics protocol with suitably defined harmonic restraints to accelerate the unbinding events while preserving the native fold. Ligands are ranked according to the mean observed scaled unbinding time. The approach, trivially parallel and easily implementable, was validated against experimental information available on biological systems of pharmacological relevance.

Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding via smoothed potential molecular dynamics simulations / L. Mollica, S. Decherchi, S.R. Zia, R. Gaspari, A. Cavalli, W. Rocchia. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 5:1(2015), pp. 11539.1-11539.10. [10.1038/srep11539]

Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding via smoothed potential molecular dynamics simulations

L. Mollica;
2015

Abstract

Drug discovery is expensive and high-risk. Its main reasons of failure are lack of efficacy and toxicity of a drug candidate. Binding affinity for the biological target has been usually considered one of the most relevant figures of merit to judge a drug candidate along with bioavailability, selectivity and metabolic properties, which could depend on off-target interactions. Nevertheless, affinity does not always satisfactorily correlate with in vivo drug efficacy. It is indeed becoming increasingly evident that the time a drug spends in contact with its target (aka residence time) can be a more reliable figure of merit. Experimental kinetic measurements are operatively limited by the cost and the time needed to synthesize compounds to be tested, to express and purify the target, and to setup the assays. We present here a simple and efficient molecular-dynamics-based computational approach to prioritize compounds according to their residence time. We devised a multiple-replica scaled molecular dynamics protocol with suitably defined harmonic restraints to accelerate the unbinding events while preserving the native fold. Ligands are ranked according to the mean observed scaled unbinding time. The approach, trivially parallel and easily implementable, was validated against experimental information available on biological systems of pharmacological relevance.
Binding Sites; Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP; HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins; Heat-Shock Proteins; Kinetics; Ligands; Probability; Protein Binding; Proteins; Receptor, Adenosine A2A; Time Factors; Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Settore CHIM/02 - Chimica Fisica
Settore BIO/10 - Biochimica
Settore CHIM/08 - Chimica Farmaceutica
2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
srep11539.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 930.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
930.52 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
srep25299.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Correction
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/926496
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 39
  • Scopus 113
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 115
social impact