Background: Pressure ulcers (PUs) represent a current issue for healthcare delivery. Nurse self-efficacy in managing PUs could predict patients’ outcome, being a proxy assessment of their overall competency to managing PUs. However, a valid and reliable scale of this task-specific self-efficacy has not yet been developed. Objectives: To develop a valid and reliable scale to assess nurses’ self-efficacy in managing PUs, that is, the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses (PUM-SES). Methods: This study had a multi-method and multi-phase design, where study reporting was supported by the STROBE checklist (File S1). Phase 1 referred to the scale development, consisting in the items’ generation, mainly based on themes emerged from the literature and discussed within a panel of experts. Phase 2 focused on a three-step validation process: the first step aimed to assess face and content validity of the pool of items previously generated (initial version of the PUM-SES); the second aimed to assess psychometrics properties through exploratory factorial analysis; the third step assessed construct validity through confirmative factorial analysis, while concurrent validity was evaluated describing the relationships between PUM-SES and an established general self-efficacy measurement. Reliability was assessed through the evaluation of stability and internal consistency. Results: PUM-SES showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct and concurrent validity, internal consistency and stability. Specifically, PUM-SES had four domains, labelled as follows: assessment, planning, supervision and decision-making. These domains were predicted by the same second-order factor, labelled as PU management self-efficacy. Conclusion: PUM-SES is a 10-item scale to measure nurses’ self-efficacy in PU management. A standardised 0–100 scoring is suggested for computing each domain and the overall scale. PUM-SES might be used in clinical and educational research. Relevance to clinical practice: Optimising nurses’ self-efficacy in PU management might enhance clinical assessment, determining better outcomes in patients with PUs.

Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses / F. Dellafiore, C. Arrigoni, G. Ghizzardi, I. Baroni, G. Conte, F. Turrini, G. Castiello, A. Magon, F. Pittella, R. Caruso. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING. - ISSN 0962-1067. - 28:17-18(2019), pp. 3177-3188. [10.1111/jocn.14875]

Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses

R. Caruso
Ultimo
2019

Abstract

Background: Pressure ulcers (PUs) represent a current issue for healthcare delivery. Nurse self-efficacy in managing PUs could predict patients’ outcome, being a proxy assessment of their overall competency to managing PUs. However, a valid and reliable scale of this task-specific self-efficacy has not yet been developed. Objectives: To develop a valid and reliable scale to assess nurses’ self-efficacy in managing PUs, that is, the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses (PUM-SES). Methods: This study had a multi-method and multi-phase design, where study reporting was supported by the STROBE checklist (File S1). Phase 1 referred to the scale development, consisting in the items’ generation, mainly based on themes emerged from the literature and discussed within a panel of experts. Phase 2 focused on a three-step validation process: the first step aimed to assess face and content validity of the pool of items previously generated (initial version of the PUM-SES); the second aimed to assess psychometrics properties through exploratory factorial analysis; the third step assessed construct validity through confirmative factorial analysis, while concurrent validity was evaluated describing the relationships between PUM-SES and an established general self-efficacy measurement. Reliability was assessed through the evaluation of stability and internal consistency. Results: PUM-SES showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct and concurrent validity, internal consistency and stability. Specifically, PUM-SES had four domains, labelled as follows: assessment, planning, supervision and decision-making. These domains were predicted by the same second-order factor, labelled as PU management self-efficacy. Conclusion: PUM-SES is a 10-item scale to measure nurses’ self-efficacy in PU management. A standardised 0–100 scoring is suggested for computing each domain and the overall scale. PUM-SES might be used in clinical and educational research. Relevance to clinical practice: Optimising nurses’ self-efficacy in PU management might enhance clinical assessment, determining better outcomes in patients with PUs.
No
English
pressure ulcers; reliability; scale development; self-efficacy; validation
Settore MED/45 - Scienze Infermieristiche Generali, Cliniche e Pediatriche
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
Goal 3: Good health and well-being for people
2019
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
28
17-18
3177
3188
12
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
orcid
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses / F. Dellafiore, C. Arrigoni, G. Ghizzardi, I. Baroni, G. Conte, F. Turrini, G. Castiello, A. Magon, F. Pittella, R. Caruso. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING. - ISSN 0962-1067. - 28:17-18(2019), pp. 3177-3188. [10.1111/jocn.14875]
reserved
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
10
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
F. Dellafiore, C. Arrigoni, G. Ghizzardi, I. Baroni, G. Conte, F. Turrini, G. Castiello, A. Magon, F. Pittella, R. Caruso
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PUM SES.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Original Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/924081
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact