On September 2021, the ECtHR has delivered its first-ever decision on a re-quest for an advisory opinion under art. 29 of the Oviedo Convention. The ECtHR has established – giving a strict interpretation of the limits of its advisory jurisdiction – that the request is not within its competence ratione materiae. The present paper aims at analyzing the decision deepening the theoretical framework the Court offered about its advisory jurisdiction, focusing on the similarities and differences among the ECHR’s advisory opinion mechanisms, and providing food for thought about the contextual-ization of this decision within the ECtHR’s constitutionalisation process.

You never get a second chance to make a first impression. La Competenza consultiva della corte Edu nella prima (e forse ultima?) advisory opinion sulla Convenzione di Oviedo / B. Vimercati. - In: BIOLAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2284-4503. - 1(2022 Apr), pp. 9-48. [10.15168/2284-4503-20221]

You never get a second chance to make a first impression. La Competenza consultiva della corte Edu nella prima (e forse ultima?) advisory opinion sulla Convenzione di Oviedo

B. Vimercati
2022

Abstract

On September 2021, the ECtHR has delivered its first-ever decision on a re-quest for an advisory opinion under art. 29 of the Oviedo Convention. The ECtHR has established – giving a strict interpretation of the limits of its advisory jurisdiction – that the request is not within its competence ratione materiae. The present paper aims at analyzing the decision deepening the theoretical framework the Court offered about its advisory jurisdiction, focusing on the similarities and differences among the ECHR’s advisory opinion mechanisms, and providing food for thought about the contextual-ization of this decision within the ECtHR’s constitutionalisation process.
Oviedo Convention; European Court of Human Rights; advisory opinion mechanisms; advisory and contentious jurisdiction; the constitutionalisation of the ECtHR
Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionale
apr-2022
https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/2236/2215
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Biolaw+journal-ESTRATTOArticolo.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 754.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
754.9 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/922669
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact