In 1453 Nicholas of Cusa receives a copy of Bessarion’s translation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. In 1458, in his De beryllo, Cusanus discusses a few passages on substance of Aristotle’s treatise. In this paper, I flesh out three themes in order to show that Cusanus detached himself from the traditional Aristotelian concept of substance: a) the emphasis on the ‘intellectual character’ of the principle of being, b) the notion of ‘coincidentia oppositorum’ and c) the concept of ‘forma substantialis’. Despite the anti-Aristotelianism that emerges from these issues, I argue that Cusanus did not developed any new humanistic interpretation of the Aristotelian text, pace what Renaissance scholars have suggested. Rather, I suggest that Cusanus adopted the peculiar ‘neo-Platonizing’ interpretation of Aristotle that Heymeric de Campo had introduced at the University of Cologne.
Nicholas of Cusa and the Aristotelian Theory of Substance / A. Fiamma (VERÖFFENTLICHUNGEN DES GRABMANN-INSTITUTES ZUR ERFORSCHUNG DER MITTELALTERLICHEN THEOLOGIE UND PHILOSOPHIE). - In: Nicholas of Cusa and the Aristotelian Tradition : A Philosophical and Theological Survey / [a cura di] E. Vimercati, V. Zaffino. - Prima edizione. - [s.l] : Walter De Gruyter, 2020. - ISBN 978-3-11-062490-8. - pp. 147-160 [10.1515/9783110630060-008]
Nicholas of Cusa and the Aristotelian Theory of Substance
A. Fiamma
2020
Abstract
In 1453 Nicholas of Cusa receives a copy of Bessarion’s translation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. In 1458, in his De beryllo, Cusanus discusses a few passages on substance of Aristotle’s treatise. In this paper, I flesh out three themes in order to show that Cusanus detached himself from the traditional Aristotelian concept of substance: a) the emphasis on the ‘intellectual character’ of the principle of being, b) the notion of ‘coincidentia oppositorum’ and c) the concept of ‘forma substantialis’. Despite the anti-Aristotelianism that emerges from these issues, I argue that Cusanus did not developed any new humanistic interpretation of the Aristotelian text, pace what Renaissance scholars have suggested. Rather, I suggest that Cusanus adopted the peculiar ‘neo-Platonizing’ interpretation of Aristotle that Heymeric de Campo had introduced at the University of Cologne.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
FIAMMA, A. Nicholas of Cusa and Aristotle.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
2.75 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.75 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.