Standard defenses of ontological individualism are challenged by arguments that exploit the dependence of social facts on material facts—that is, facts that are not about human individuals. In this article, I discuss Brian Epstein’s “materialism” in The Ant Trap: granting Epstein’s strict definition of individualism, I show that his arguments depend crucially on a generous conception of social properties and social facts. Individualists, however, are only committed to the claim that projectible properties are individualistically realized, and materialists have not undermined this claim.
Rescuing Ontological Individualism / F. Guala. - In: PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. - ISSN 0031-8248. - 89:3(2022), pp. 471-485. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1017/psa.2021.35]
Rescuing Ontological Individualism
F. Guala
2022
Abstract
Standard defenses of ontological individualism are challenged by arguments that exploit the dependence of social facts on material facts—that is, facts that are not about human individuals. In this article, I discuss Brian Epstein’s “materialism” in The Ant Trap: granting Epstein’s strict definition of individualism, I show that his arguments depend crucially on a generous conception of social properties and social facts. Individualists, however, are only committed to the claim that projectible properties are individualistically realized, and materialists have not undermined this claim.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
rescuing-ontological-individualism.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
214.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
214.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.