This article is about current challenges to evidence-based medicine (EMB) in Italy. The authors, who share a 20-year commitment to the field of clinical research, discuss what they define as a phase of "stagnation" in practicing and teaching methods and research tactics, both in clinical and academic settings. Early success of EBM cultural movement was not persistent. The authors reason about how the teaching of EBM has remained a niche, concerning few professionals compared to the needs of the country. The authors identify some reasons that might have led to inconsistent attention to research methodology and address ways to strengthen the contribution of academic medicine to clinical research.

Dieci anni di stagnazione della ricerca, non solo clinica, nel contesto accademico italiano = 10 years of stagnant clinical research in the Italian academic context / L. Moja, R. Banzi, F. Cabitza, M. Capobussi, G. Castellini, D. Cereda, M. Cinquini, C. Colombo, G. Costantino, R. D'Amico, S. Gianola, M. Gonzalez-Lorenzo, G. Lodi, E. Lucenteforte, S. Minozzi, I. Moschetti, P. Muti, D. Petri, G.M. Podda, A. Squizzato, M. Tirani, G. Virgili, D. Berardinelli. - In: RECENTI PROGRESSI IN MEDICINA. - ISSN 2038-1840. - 113:1(2022 Jan), pp. 30-35. [10.1701/3733.37182]

Dieci anni di stagnazione della ricerca, non solo clinica, nel contesto accademico italiano = 10 years of stagnant clinical research in the Italian academic context

L. Moja
Primo
;
M. Capobussi;G. Castellini;G. Costantino;G. Lodi;P. Muti;G.M. Podda;
2022

Abstract

This article is about current challenges to evidence-based medicine (EMB) in Italy. The authors, who share a 20-year commitment to the field of clinical research, discuss what they define as a phase of "stagnation" in practicing and teaching methods and research tactics, both in clinical and academic settings. Early success of EBM cultural movement was not persistent. The authors reason about how the teaching of EBM has remained a niche, concerning few professionals compared to the needs of the country. The authors identify some reasons that might have led to inconsistent attention to research methodology and address ways to strengthen the contribution of academic medicine to clinical research.
Settore MED/01 - Statistica Medica
gen-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10_Commenti - Moja.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 102.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
102.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/917012
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact