Patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), including oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, oral submucous fibrosis, and oral lichen planus/lichenoid lesions, can be challenging to manage. A small proportion will undergo cancer development and determining a patient's cancer risk is key to making management decisions. Yet, our understanding of the natural history of OPMDs has not been fully elucidated, and a precision approach based on the integration of numerous predictive markers has not been validated by prospective studies. Evidence-based health promotion by clinicians and healthcare systems is not embraced universally. Medical and surgical interventions evaluated by rigorous research measuring important endpoints, such as cancer development, mortality, or survival, are difficult and expensive to run. Most of these studies employ non-ideal surrogate endpoints and have deep methodologic flaws. Diagnostic criteria for enrolling research subjects are not uniform, and patients with the highest risk for cancer development comprise small proportions of those enrolled. Few studies explore quality of life and patient preferences. It is time to rethink how we approach the management of these patients, across each OPMD, and considering the healthcare infrastructure and cost-effectiveness. Global networks with well-characterized patient populations with OPMDs and well-designed interventional trials using validated outcome measures are needed.

Management of oral potentially malignant disorders / A.R. Kerr, G. Lodi. - In: ORAL DISEASES. - ISSN 1354-523X. - 27:8(2021 Nov), pp. 2008-2025. [10.1111/odi.13980]

Management of oral potentially malignant disorders

G. Lodi
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), including oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, oral submucous fibrosis, and oral lichen planus/lichenoid lesions, can be challenging to manage. A small proportion will undergo cancer development and determining a patient's cancer risk is key to making management decisions. Yet, our understanding of the natural history of OPMDs has not been fully elucidated, and a precision approach based on the integration of numerous predictive markers has not been validated by prospective studies. Evidence-based health promotion by clinicians and healthcare systems is not embraced universally. Medical and surgical interventions evaluated by rigorous research measuring important endpoints, such as cancer development, mortality, or survival, are difficult and expensive to run. Most of these studies employ non-ideal surrogate endpoints and have deep methodologic flaws. Diagnostic criteria for enrolling research subjects are not uniform, and patients with the highest risk for cancer development comprise small proportions of those enrolled. Few studies explore quality of life and patient preferences. It is time to rethink how we approach the management of these patients, across each OPMD, and considering the healthcare infrastructure and cost-effectiveness. Global networks with well-characterized patient populations with OPMDs and well-designed interventional trials using validated outcome measures are needed.
cancer and pre-cancer; mouth; mucosal diseases; oncology; therapies; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Humans; Leukoplakia, Oral; Mouth Mucosa; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Lichen Planus, Oral; Mouth Neoplasms; Precancerous Conditions;
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
nov-2021
29-lug-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Oral Diseases - 2021 - Kerr - Management of oral potentially malignant disorders.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 502.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
502.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/913615
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact