Background: Budesonide was included in the European Baseline Series in 2000 as the most suitable marker forcorticosteroid hypersensitivity. In the last two decades, a decreasing trend of budesonide allergy has been observed. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to budesonide in a large, Italian patch test population, characterizing patients according to MOAHLFA index and evaluating the benefit with extended readings of budesonide patch test. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patient demographics and patch test results over a 2-year period (2018–2019) was performed at 14 patch test clinics in Italy. Results: Ninety out of 14 544 (0.6%) patients reacted to budesonide 0.01% pet. Positive reactions were mild in 54.4% and late readings at day 7 showed new positive reactions in 37.8% of patients. The MOAHLFA index showed a significant positive association with male gender, atopic dermatitis, and age >40 years and a significant negative association with hand and face dermatitis. Conclusions: We documented a low prevalence of budesonide allergy in Italy, confirming its decreasing trend recently reported in the literature. Nevertheless, budesonide needs to be maintained in the baseline series for its good ability to detect corticosteroid sensitization.

Patch testing of budesonide in Italy: The SIDAPA baseline series experience, 2018–2019 / L. Stingeni, R. Marietti, L. Bianchi, F. Guarneri, S.M. Ferrucci, A.G. Faraci, C. Foti, P. Romita, C. Patruno, M. Napolitano, R. Gallo, M. Corazza, D. Schena, N. Milanesi, F. Bruni, P. Pigatto, M.L. Musumeci, E. Martina, V. Piras, M. Tramontana, K. Hansel. - In: CONTACT DERMATITIS. - ISSN 0105-1873. - 85:3(2021 Sep), pp. 317-323. [10.1111/cod.13873]

Patch testing of budesonide in Italy: The SIDAPA baseline series experience, 2018–2019

P. Pigatto;
2021

Abstract

Background: Budesonide was included in the European Baseline Series in 2000 as the most suitable marker forcorticosteroid hypersensitivity. In the last two decades, a decreasing trend of budesonide allergy has been observed. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to budesonide in a large, Italian patch test population, characterizing patients according to MOAHLFA index and evaluating the benefit with extended readings of budesonide patch test. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patient demographics and patch test results over a 2-year period (2018–2019) was performed at 14 patch test clinics in Italy. Results: Ninety out of 14 544 (0.6%) patients reacted to budesonide 0.01% pet. Positive reactions were mild in 54.4% and late readings at day 7 showed new positive reactions in 37.8% of patients. The MOAHLFA index showed a significant positive association with male gender, atopic dermatitis, and age >40 years and a significant negative association with hand and face dermatitis. Conclusions: We documented a low prevalence of budesonide allergy in Italy, confirming its decreasing trend recently reported in the literature. Nevertheless, budesonide needs to be maintained in the baseline series for its good ability to detect corticosteroid sensitization.
budesonide; corticosteroids; patch test; SIDAPA baseline series; skin tests; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Budesonide; Cross Reactions; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dermatitis, Occupational; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Patch Tests; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Sex Distribution
Settore MED/35 - Malattie Cutanee e Veneree
set-2021
30-apr-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Contact Dermatitis - 2021 - Stingeni - Patch testing of budesonide in Italy The SIDAPA baseline series experience 2018.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.31 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/911485
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact