We present an experiment that sets up a context of production of a common output obtained by using production means that are randomly and unequally distributed. Before the production phase, subjects must choose a distributive principle for the output division, under ignorance of the allocation of the production means. Subsequently, they make a distributive choice fully aware of their luck and performance. The aim of the experiment is to test, first, whether ordinary subjects in an impartial situation are capable of converging on a fair principle of distribution – able of redressing the arbitrariness of the initial production means allocation; and second, whether these same ordinary subjects are capable of actually following that principle in a real distributive choice that excludes coercion, reputation effects and other forms of social pressures. The main finding is that a distributive rule that redresses initial inequalities is both accepted ex-ante and actually applied ex-post by most individuals. Our conclusion is relevant for the issue of realism of normative theories of justice and the possibility of institution design aimed at implementing distributive justice principles and policies

Liberal egalitarian justice in the distribution of a common output. Experimental evidence and implications for effective institution design / G. Degli Antoni, M. Faillo, P. Francés-Gómez, L. Sacconi. - In: JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1744-1374. - (2022), pp. 1-18. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1017/S1744137422000029]

Liberal egalitarian justice in the distribution of a common output. Experimental evidence and implications for effective institution design

L. Sacconi
Ultimo
Membro del Collaboration Group
2022

Abstract

We present an experiment that sets up a context of production of a common output obtained by using production means that are randomly and unequally distributed. Before the production phase, subjects must choose a distributive principle for the output division, under ignorance of the allocation of the production means. Subsequently, they make a distributive choice fully aware of their luck and performance. The aim of the experiment is to test, first, whether ordinary subjects in an impartial situation are capable of converging on a fair principle of distribution – able of redressing the arbitrariness of the initial production means allocation; and second, whether these same ordinary subjects are capable of actually following that principle in a real distributive choice that excludes coercion, reputation effects and other forms of social pressures. The main finding is that a distributive rule that redresses initial inequalities is both accepted ex-ante and actually applied ex-post by most individuals. Our conclusion is relevant for the issue of realism of normative theories of justice and the possibility of institution design aimed at implementing distributive justice principles and policies
game theory; inequality; institution design; justice theory; norms
Settore SECS-P/02 - Politica Economica
Settore SPS/01 - Filosofia Politica
22-feb-2022
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics/article/liberal-egalitarian-justice-in-the-distribution-of-a-common-output-experimental-evidence-and-implications-for-effective-institution-design/120B95E9B4F0D1FDBB90C98A9C8E6962
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
liberal-egalitarian-justice-in-the-distribution-of-a-common-output-experimental-evidence-and-implications-for-effective-institution-design.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo completo
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 326.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
326.74 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2434/911308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact