Objective: Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is a modality in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(OPSCC). This study was planned to determine whether Selective Neck Dissection (SND) is oncological safe procedure even in patients with lymph node metastases. Methods: OPSCC patients were divided into Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND) and SND groups. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and regional recurrence free survival (RRFS). Results: Thirty-seven SNDs and 18 MRNDs were performed. Regional relapse rate was 6.1% in SND group whilst 18.8% in MRND group(p=0.19). The 5-year OS, DFS and RRFS rates’ differences were not statistically significant between SND and MRND groups (p=0.40, p=0.42 and p=0.18, respectively). At multivariate analysis, advanced stage impacted the 5-year OS and DFS(HR=9.39, p<0.01 and HR=11.03, p=0.04). Conclusions: The SND seems to be effective in a TORS framework. The indication should be accurately discussed by the multidisciplinary tumor board.
Neck dissection and trans oral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma / G. Meccariello, A. Maniaci, G. Bianchi, G. Cammaroto, G. Iannella, A. Catalano, R. Sgarzani, A. De Vito, P. Capaccio, S. Pelucchi, C. Vicini. - In: AURIS, NASUS, LARYNX. - ISSN 0385-8146. - 49:1(2022 Feb), pp. 117-125. [10.1016/j.anl.2021.05.007]
Neck dissection and trans oral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
G. Meccariello
Primo
;G. Bianchi;A. Catalano;P. Capaccio;S. Pelucchi;
2022
Abstract
Objective: Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is a modality in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(OPSCC). This study was planned to determine whether Selective Neck Dissection (SND) is oncological safe procedure even in patients with lymph node metastases. Methods: OPSCC patients were divided into Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND) and SND groups. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and regional recurrence free survival (RRFS). Results: Thirty-seven SNDs and 18 MRNDs were performed. Regional relapse rate was 6.1% in SND group whilst 18.8% in MRND group(p=0.19). The 5-year OS, DFS and RRFS rates’ differences were not statistically significant between SND and MRND groups (p=0.40, p=0.42 and p=0.18, respectively). At multivariate analysis, advanced stage impacted the 5-year OS and DFS(HR=9.39, p<0.01 and HR=11.03, p=0.04). Conclusions: The SND seems to be effective in a TORS framework. The indication should be accurately discussed by the multidisciplinary tumor board.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0385814621001632-main.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.12 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.