Samples of fault gouge from the San Andreas Fault drill hole (SAFOD), a shale from the North Sea sedimentary basin and schists from metamorphic rocks in the Alps have been analyzed with high energy synchrotron X-rays to determine preferred orientation of mica and clay minerals. The method relies on obtaining 20 diffraction images which are then processed with the crystallographic Rietveld method, implemented in the software MAUD, allowing for deconvolution of phases and extraction of their orientation distributions It is possible to distinguish between detrital like/muscovite and authigenic illite/smectite, kaolinite and chlorite, and muscovite and biotite, with strongly overlapping peaks in the diffraction pattern The results demonstrate that phyllosilicates show large texture variations in various environments, where different mechanisms produce the rock microfabrics. fault gouge fabrics are quite weak and asymmetric with maxima for (001) in the range of 15-25 multiples of random distribution (m.rd.). This is attributed to heterogeneous deformation with randomization, as well as dissolution precipitation reactions. Shale fabrics have maxima ranging from 3 to 9 m.r.d and this is due to sedimentation and compaction. The strongest fabrics were observed in metamorphic schists (10-14 m.r.d) and developed by deformation as well as recrystallization in a stress field. In the analyzed samples, fabrics of co-existing quartz are weak. All phyllosilicate textures can be explained by orientation of (001) platelets, with no additional constraints on a-axes (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Preferred orientation of phyllosilicates: Comparison of fault gouge, shale and schist / H. Wenk, W. Kanitpanyacharoen, M. Voltolini. - In: JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY. - ISSN 0191-8141. - 32:4(2010 Apr), pp. 478-489. [10.1016/j.jsg.2010.02.003]

Preferred orientation of phyllosilicates: Comparison of fault gouge, shale and schist

M. Voltolini
Ultimo
2010

Abstract

Samples of fault gouge from the San Andreas Fault drill hole (SAFOD), a shale from the North Sea sedimentary basin and schists from metamorphic rocks in the Alps have been analyzed with high energy synchrotron X-rays to determine preferred orientation of mica and clay minerals. The method relies on obtaining 20 diffraction images which are then processed with the crystallographic Rietveld method, implemented in the software MAUD, allowing for deconvolution of phases and extraction of their orientation distributions It is possible to distinguish between detrital like/muscovite and authigenic illite/smectite, kaolinite and chlorite, and muscovite and biotite, with strongly overlapping peaks in the diffraction pattern The results demonstrate that phyllosilicates show large texture variations in various environments, where different mechanisms produce the rock microfabrics. fault gouge fabrics are quite weak and asymmetric with maxima for (001) in the range of 15-25 multiples of random distribution (m.rd.). This is attributed to heterogeneous deformation with randomization, as well as dissolution precipitation reactions. Shale fabrics have maxima ranging from 3 to 9 m.r.d and this is due to sedimentation and compaction. The strongest fabrics were observed in metamorphic schists (10-14 m.r.d) and developed by deformation as well as recrystallization in a stress field. In the analyzed samples, fabrics of co-existing quartz are weak. All phyllosilicate textures can be explained by orientation of (001) platelets, with no additional constraints on a-axes (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Fault gouge; Phyllosilicate fabrics; Schist; Shale;
Settore GEO/06 - Mineralogia
Settore GEO/07 - Petrologia e Petrografia
apr-2010
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0191814110000246-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.7 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.7 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/909012
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 76
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 67
social impact