Over the last 4 decades, percutaneous coronary intervention has evolved dramatically and is now an acceptable treatment option for patients with advanced coronary artery disease. However, trialists have struggled to establish the respective roles for percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, especially in patients with multivessel disease and unprotected left-main stem coronary artery disease. Several pivotal trials and meta-analyses comparing these 2 revascularization strategies have enabled the relative merits of each technique to be established with regard to the type of ischemic syndrome, the coronary anatomy, and the patient's overall comorbidity. Precision medicine with individualized prognosis is emerging as an important method of selecting treatment. However, the never-ending advancement of technology, in conjunction with the emergence of novel pharmacological agents, will in the future continue to force us to reconsider the evolving question: “Which treatment strategy is better and for which patient?”

Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective / P.W. Serruys, M. Ono, S. Garg, H. Hara, H. Kawashima, G. Pompilio, D. Andreini, D.R. Holmes, Y. Onuma, S.B. King III. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0735-1097. - 78:4(2021 Jul 27), pp. 384-407. [10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.024]

Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective

G. Pompilio;D. Andreini;
2021

Abstract

Over the last 4 decades, percutaneous coronary intervention has evolved dramatically and is now an acceptable treatment option for patients with advanced coronary artery disease. However, trialists have struggled to establish the respective roles for percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, especially in patients with multivessel disease and unprotected left-main stem coronary artery disease. Several pivotal trials and meta-analyses comparing these 2 revascularization strategies have enabled the relative merits of each technique to be established with regard to the type of ischemic syndrome, the coronary anatomy, and the patient's overall comorbidity. Precision medicine with individualized prognosis is emerging as an important method of selecting treatment. However, the never-ending advancement of technology, in conjunction with the emergence of novel pharmacological agents, will in the future continue to force us to reconsider the evolving question: “Which treatment strategy is better and for which patient?”
coronary artery bypass graft; coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stent; percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Patient Selection
Settore MED/11 - Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare
Settore MED/23 - Chirurgia Cardiaca
27-lug-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Percutaneous.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.5 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/907112
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact