A recurrent finding in personal network research is that individual and social outcomes are influenced not just by the kind of people one knows, but also by how those people are connected to each other. Personal network structure-The way in which one's personal contacts know and interact with each other-reflects broader trends in social organization and personal communities, and shapes patterns of social capital, support, and isolation. This article proposes a method to identify typologies of structure in large collections of personal networks. The method is applied to six datasets collected in widely different circumstances and using various survey instruments. It is then compared with another recently introduced method to extract typologies of egocentric network structure. Findings show that personal network structure can be effectively summarized using just three measures of cohesive subgroup characteristics. Structural typologies can then be identified by applying standard cluster analysis techniques to the three variables. Both methods considered in the article capture significant variation in network structures, but they also show substantial levels of disagreement and cross-classification. I discuss similarities and differences between the methods, and potential applications of the proposed typologies to substantive research on personal communities, social support, and social capital.

Structure in personal networks : Constructing and comparing typologies / R. Vacca. - In: NETWORK SCIENCE. - ISSN 2050-1250. - 8:2(2020), pp. 142-167. [10.1017/nws.2019.29]

Structure in personal networks : Constructing and comparing typologies

R. Vacca
2020

Abstract

A recurrent finding in personal network research is that individual and social outcomes are influenced not just by the kind of people one knows, but also by how those people are connected to each other. Personal network structure-The way in which one's personal contacts know and interact with each other-reflects broader trends in social organization and personal communities, and shapes patterns of social capital, support, and isolation. This article proposes a method to identify typologies of structure in large collections of personal networks. The method is applied to six datasets collected in widely different circumstances and using various survey instruments. It is then compared with another recently introduced method to extract typologies of egocentric network structure. Findings show that personal network structure can be effectively summarized using just three measures of cohesive subgroup characteristics. Structural typologies can then be identified by applying standard cluster analysis techniques to the three variables. Both methods considered in the article capture significant variation in network structures, but they also show substantial levels of disagreement and cross-classification. I discuss similarities and differences between the methods, and potential applications of the proposed typologies to substantive research on personal communities, social support, and social capital.
cluster analysis; community detection; core/periphery; ego-networks; k-medoid; modularity; personal communities; social capital; social isolation; social support
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
structure-in-personal-networks-constructing-and-comparing-typologies.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 4.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/902077
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact