There is a growing disconnect between Europeanization and democratization in the immediate neighborhood of the European Union. Often overlooked by euro-centric academic research, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine are a litmus test for the challenges facing democratic consolidation in a geopolitically contested region. The study dissects the relationship between Europeanization and Democratization processes in the three countries; scrutinizes the internal and external challenges to democratic consolidation and critically assesses the effectiveness of EU’s normative power projection in the region. In the process, the author challenges Huntington’s concept of ‘snowballing’, disconfirming his one directional democratic cascade theory in the specific condition of the countries comprising the case study. The unique condition of these countries is epitomized by the European Union’s facilitation of democracy, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, Russia’s facilitation of the status quo, while also encouraging undemocratic practices. This challenges the neofunctionalist democratic spillover expectation and accredits a path-dependent neo-institutionalist account of democratization in the region. Moreover, the author finds robust evidence in support of the modernization theory of democracy, while also confirming the negative effects of active geopolitical competition on the battleground countries. The study questions the efficacy of EU’s democracy promotion efforts and argues in favor of anchoring the three countries on the European integration track as an imperative mechanism for boosting the chances of democratic consolidation.

EUROPEANIZATION VERSUS DEMOCRATIZATION IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA AND UKRAINE. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION / M. Popsoi ; advisor: F. Franchino. Universita' degli Studi di MILANO, 2021 Dec 10. 32. ciclo, Anno Accademico 2020. [10.13130/popsoi-mihail_phd2021-12-10].

EUROPEANIZATION VERSUS DEMOCRATIZATION IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA AND UKRAINE. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION

M. Popsoi
2021

Abstract

There is a growing disconnect between Europeanization and democratization in the immediate neighborhood of the European Union. Often overlooked by euro-centric academic research, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine are a litmus test for the challenges facing democratic consolidation in a geopolitically contested region. The study dissects the relationship between Europeanization and Democratization processes in the three countries; scrutinizes the internal and external challenges to democratic consolidation and critically assesses the effectiveness of EU’s normative power projection in the region. In the process, the author challenges Huntington’s concept of ‘snowballing’, disconfirming his one directional democratic cascade theory in the specific condition of the countries comprising the case study. The unique condition of these countries is epitomized by the European Union’s facilitation of democracy, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, Russia’s facilitation of the status quo, while also encouraging undemocratic practices. This challenges the neofunctionalist democratic spillover expectation and accredits a path-dependent neo-institutionalist account of democratization in the region. Moreover, the author finds robust evidence in support of the modernization theory of democracy, while also confirming the negative effects of active geopolitical competition on the battleground countries. The study questions the efficacy of EU’s democracy promotion efforts and argues in favor of anchoring the three countries on the European integration track as an imperative mechanism for boosting the chances of democratic consolidation.
10-dic-2021
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
FRANCHINO, FABIO
Doctoral Thesis
EUROPEANIZATION VERSUS DEMOCRATIZATION IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA AND UKRAINE. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION / M. Popsoi ; advisor: F. Franchino. Universita' degli Studi di MILANO, 2021 Dec 10. 32. ciclo, Anno Accademico 2020. [10.13130/popsoi-mihail_phd2021-12-10].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
phd_unimi_R11774.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Tesi di dottorato completa
Dimensione 2.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.93 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/886506
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact