Background: Based on the International ALPPS registry, we have recently proposed two easily applicable risk models (pre-stage1 and 2) for predicting 90-day mortality in ALPPS but a validation of both models has not been performed yet. Methods: The validation cohort (VC) was composed of subsequent cases of the ALPPS registry and cases of centers outside the ALPPS registry. Results: The VC was composed of a total of 258 patients including 70 patients outside the ALPPS registry with 32 cases of early mortalities (12%). Development cohort (DC) and VC were comparable in terms of patient and surgery characteristics. The VC validated both models with an acceptable prediction for the pre-stage 1 (c-statistic 0.64, P = 0.009 vs. 0.77, P < 0.001) and a good prediction for the pre-stage 2 model (c-statistic 0.77, P < 0.001 vs. 0.85, P < 0.001) as compared to the DC. Overall model performance measured by Brier score was comparable between VC and DC for the pre-stage 1 (0.089 vs. 0.081) and pre-stage 2 model (0.079 vs. 0087). Conclusion: The ALPPS risk score is a fully validated model to estimate the individual risk of patients undergoing ALPPS and to assist clinical decision making to avoid procedure-related early mortality after ALPPS.

Performance validation of the ALPPS risk model / M. Linecker, C. Kuemmerli, P. Kambakamba, A. Schlegel, P. Muiesan, I. Capobianco, S. Nadalin, O.J. Torres, A. Mehrabi, G.A. Stavrou, K.J. Oldhafer, G. Lurje, D. Balci, H. Lang, R. Robles-Campos, R. Hernandez-Alejandro, M. Malago, E. De Santibanes, P.-. Clavien, H. Petrowsky. - In: HPB. - ISSN 1365-182X. - 21:6(2019), pp. 711-721. [10.1016/j.hpb.2018.10.003]

Performance validation of the ALPPS risk model

P. Muiesan;
2019

Abstract

Background: Based on the International ALPPS registry, we have recently proposed two easily applicable risk models (pre-stage1 and 2) for predicting 90-day mortality in ALPPS but a validation of both models has not been performed yet. Methods: The validation cohort (VC) was composed of subsequent cases of the ALPPS registry and cases of centers outside the ALPPS registry. Results: The VC was composed of a total of 258 patients including 70 patients outside the ALPPS registry with 32 cases of early mortalities (12%). Development cohort (DC) and VC were comparable in terms of patient and surgery characteristics. The VC validated both models with an acceptable prediction for the pre-stage 1 (c-statistic 0.64, P = 0.009 vs. 0.77, P < 0.001) and a good prediction for the pre-stage 2 model (c-statistic 0.77, P < 0.001 vs. 0.85, P < 0.001) as compared to the DC. Overall model performance measured by Brier score was comparable between VC and DC for the pre-stage 1 (0.089 vs. 0.081) and pre-stage 2 model (0.079 vs. 0087). Conclusion: The ALPPS risk score is a fully validated model to estimate the individual risk of patients undergoing ALPPS and to assist clinical decision making to avoid procedure-related early mortality after ALPPS.
Aged; Europe; Female; Hepatectomy; Humans; Incidence; Ligation; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Registries
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
2019
HPB
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019-Performance validation of the ALPPS risk model.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 565.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
565.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/883548
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact