Background: Biliary complications can result in a significant morbidity for split liver graft recipients. Biliary drainage for segment 1 and 4 is highly variable and could be the source of bile leaks. Use of a bench cholangiogram (BCH) can accurately define the segmental biliary system and identify any significant biliary radicles that need retention or repair during bench preparation of split grafts. This study evaluates the clinical relevance of routine BCH in split liver transplantation (SLT). Methods: Retrospective review of 100 BCH images performed during ex situ deceased donor SLT between January 2009 and January 2015. The radiographs were reviewed by two surgeons and the biliary anatomy was compared using Huang and Reichert classification. Results: 100 BCH images were reviewed. Variant anatomy was frequently identified in the intrahepatic bile duct system, the number and drainage patterns of segment 1&4 duct was diverse. BCH results guided the line of parenchymal transection to obtain a single segment 2&3 duct in 15 cases. A surgical intervention in the form of suture ligation of significant segment 1 or 4 duct at bench preparation was performed in 6 cases. BCH images guided surgical control of post-operative bile leak in 3 patients. Conclusion: Bench cholangiogram is a useful tool to guide liver parenchymal transection and potentially reduce the incidence of biliary complications.

Utility of a routine bench cholangiogram for ex situ split liver procedure / N.R. Battula, R. Anbarasan, V. Thumma, M.T.P.R. Perera, P. Muiesan, J.R. Isaac, K. Sharif, D.F. Mirza. - In: CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 0902-0063. - 33:7(2019), pp. e13614.1-e13614.5. [10.1111/ctr.13614]

Utility of a routine bench cholangiogram for ex situ split liver procedure

P. Muiesan;
2019

Abstract

Background: Biliary complications can result in a significant morbidity for split liver graft recipients. Biliary drainage for segment 1 and 4 is highly variable and could be the source of bile leaks. Use of a bench cholangiogram (BCH) can accurately define the segmental biliary system and identify any significant biliary radicles that need retention or repair during bench preparation of split grafts. This study evaluates the clinical relevance of routine BCH in split liver transplantation (SLT). Methods: Retrospective review of 100 BCH images performed during ex situ deceased donor SLT between January 2009 and January 2015. The radiographs were reviewed by two surgeons and the biliary anatomy was compared using Huang and Reichert classification. Results: 100 BCH images were reviewed. Variant anatomy was frequently identified in the intrahepatic bile duct system, the number and drainage patterns of segment 1&4 duct was diverse. BCH results guided the line of parenchymal transection to obtain a single segment 2&3 duct in 15 cases. A surgical intervention in the form of suture ligation of significant segment 1 or 4 duct at bench preparation was performed in 6 cases. BCH images guided surgical control of post-operative bile leak in 3 patients. Conclusion: Bench cholangiogram is a useful tool to guide liver parenchymal transection and potentially reduce the incidence of biliary complications.
diagnostic techniques and imaging; liver transplantation; split; surgical technique; Adolescent; Adult; Biliary Tract; Cholangiography; Drainage; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatectomy; Humans; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Tissue Donors; Young Adult; Liver Transplantation
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019-Utility of a routine bench cholangiogram for ex situ split liver procedure.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 958.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
958.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/883508
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact