Introduction: We aimed to review the safety and effectiveness of dual-layer micromesh stents for the endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases were searched using the words ‘micromesh carotid stent’. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. Results: The search of the Literature retrieved 84 results. After assessment of full texts, 13 papers were included in the study. The analyzed studies included 797 patients, 32.1% of them were symptomatic. The reported technical success rate was 100% in all cases. During early follow-up, complications occurred overall in 16/797 patients (2%: 12 strokes, 3 deaths, and one transient ischemic attack). The study with the longest follow-up reported a survival rate of 82% at 4 years and a stroke-free survival rate of 84% at 4 years. Conclusion: With the limit of low data quality, the use of dual-layer stents was reported to be as safe and effective at 30 days for the endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis. The reported technical success was 100% in all cases. Further data coming from randomized controlled trials and larger cohort studies with longer follow-up are nevertheless needed for a better evaluation.

Endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis using a dual-layer micromesh stents: a systematic review / D. Mazzaccaro, M. Giannetta, F. Fancoli, P. Righini, G. Nano. - In: EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES. - ISSN 1743-4440. - 18:6(2021), pp. 545-552. [10.1080/17434440.2021.1927707]

Endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis using a dual-layer micromesh stents: a systematic review

D. Mazzaccaro
Primo
;
M. Giannetta
Secondo
;
F. Fancoli;G. Nano
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to review the safety and effectiveness of dual-layer micromesh stents for the endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases were searched using the words ‘micromesh carotid stent’. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. Results: The search of the Literature retrieved 84 results. After assessment of full texts, 13 papers were included in the study. The analyzed studies included 797 patients, 32.1% of them were symptomatic. The reported technical success rate was 100% in all cases. During early follow-up, complications occurred overall in 16/797 patients (2%: 12 strokes, 3 deaths, and one transient ischemic attack). The study with the longest follow-up reported a survival rate of 82% at 4 years and a stroke-free survival rate of 84% at 4 years. Conclusion: With the limit of low data quality, the use of dual-layer stents was reported to be as safe and effective at 30 days for the endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis. The reported technical success was 100% in all cases. Further data coming from randomized controlled trials and larger cohort studies with longer follow-up are nevertheless needed for a better evaluation.
c-guard; carotid stenosis; Carotid stenting; dual-layer; micromesh; nitinol stent; roadsaver; Cohort Studies; Humans; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Carotid Stenosis; Endovascular Procedures; Stroke;
Settore MED/22 - Chirurgia Vascolare
2021
19-giu-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis using a dual layer micromesh stents a systematic review.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.32 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/882145
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact