During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we looked at submitted manuscripts and peer review activities for all Elsevier journals between February and May 2018-2020, including data on over 5 million authors and referees. Results showed that during the first wave of the pandemic, women submitted proportionally fewer manuscripts than men. This deficit was especially pronounced among more junior cohorts of women academics. The rate of the peer-review invitation acceptance showed a less pronounced gender pattern with women taking on a greater service responsibility for journals, except for health & medicine, the field where the impact of COVID-19 research has been more prominent. Our findings suggest that the first wave of the pandemic has created potentially cumulative advantages for men.

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A study on 2329 Elsevier journals / F. Squazzoni, G. Bravo, F. Grimaldo, D. García-Costa, M. Farjam, B. Mehmani. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 16:10(2021 Oct 20), pp. e0257919.1-e0257919.17. [10.1371/journal.pone.0257919]

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A study on 2329 Elsevier journals

F. Squazzoni
Primo
;
2021

Abstract

During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles. Given that most academics were forced to work from home, the competing demands for familial duties may have penalized the scientific productivity of women. To test this hypothesis, we looked at submitted manuscripts and peer review activities for all Elsevier journals between February and May 2018-2020, including data on over 5 million authors and referees. Results showed that during the first wave of the pandemic, women submitted proportionally fewer manuscripts than men. This deficit was especially pronounced among more junior cohorts of women academics. The rate of the peer-review invitation acceptance showed a less pronounced gender pattern with women taking on a greater service responsibility for journals, except for health & medicine, the field where the impact of COVID-19 research has been more prominent. Our findings suggest that the first wave of the pandemic has created potentially cumulative advantages for men.
Covid19; pandemic; gender gap; submissions; journals; peer review
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0257919
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SquazzoniEtAl2021GenderGapCovid19.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/876478
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact